BARONETAGE | ||||||
Last updated 20/11/2018 (20 Jun 2025) | ||||||
Date | Type | Order | Name | Born | Died | Age |
Names of baronets shown in blue have not yet been placed on the Official Roll of the Baronetage. | ||||||
Dates in italics in the "Born" column indicate that the baronet was baptised on that date; dates in italics in the "Died" column indicate that the baronet was buried on that date. | ||||||
SETON of Abercorn, Linlithgow | ||||||
3 Jun 1663 | NS | 1 | Walter Seton | 20 Feb 1692 | ||
20 Feb 1692 | 2 | Walter Seton | 3 Jan 1708 | |||
3 Jan 1708 | 3 | Henry Seton | 1751 | |||
1751 | 4 | Henry Seton | 29 Jun 1788 | |||
29 Jun 1788 | 5 | Alexander Seton | 4 May 1772 | 4 Feb 1810 | 37 | |
4 Feb 1810 | 6 | Henry John Seton For information on the death of this baronet, see the note at the foot of this page |
4 Apr 1796 | 21 Jul 1868 | 72 | |
21 Jul 1868 | 7 | Charles Hay Seton | 14 Nov 1797 | 11 Jun 1869 | 71 | |
11 Jun 1869 | 8 | Bruce Maxwell Seton | 31 Jan 1836 | 12 Mar 1915 | 79 | |
12 Mar 1915 | 9 | Bruce Gordon Seton | 13 Oct 1868 | 3 Jul 1932 | 63 | |
3 Jul 1932 | 10 | Alexander Hay Seton For further information on this baronet, see the note at the foot of this page |
14 Aug 1904 | 7 Feb 1963 | 58 | |
7 Feb 1963 | 11 | Bruce Lovat Seton | 29 May 1909 | 28 Sep 1969 | 60 | |
28 Sep 1969 | 12 | Christopher Bruce Seton | 3 Oct 1909 | 17 Jan 1988 | 78 | |
17 Jan 1988 | 13 | Iain Bruce Seton | 27 Aug 1942 | 13 Jun 2025 | 82 | |
13 Jun 2025 | 14 | Lawrence Bruce Seton | 1 Jul 1968 | |||
SETON of Garleton, Haddington | ||||||
9 Dec 1664 | NS | 1 | John Seton | 29 Sep 1639 | Feb 1686 | 46 |
Feb 1686 to c 1720 |
2 | George Seton On his death the heir was under attainder and the baronetcy was thus forfeited |
c 1720 | |||
SETON of Windygowl | ||||||
24 Jan 1671 to Nov 1671 |
NS | 1 | Robert Seton Extinct on his death |
10 Nov 1641 | Nov 1671 | 30 |
SETON of Pitmedden, Aberdeen | ||||||
15 Jan 1683 | NS | 1 | Alexander Seton | 29 May 1719 | ||
29 May 1719 | 2 | William Seton MP for Scotland 1707‑1708 |
6 Mar 1673 | 1744 | 71 | |
1744 | 3 | Alexander Seton | 19 Jan 1703 | 21 Jul 1750 | 47 | |
21 Jul 1750 | 4 | William Seton | 11 Oct 1774 | |||
11 Oct 1774 | 5 | Archibald Seton | 26 May 1775 | |||
26 May 1775 | 6 | William Seton | 16 Feb 1818 | |||
16 Feb 1818 | 7 | William Coote Seton | 19 Dec 1808 | 30 Dec 1880 | 72 | |
30 Dec 1880 | 8 | James Lumsden Seton For information on the death of this baronet, see the note at the foot of this page |
1 Sep 1835 | 26 Sep 1884 | 49 | |
26 Sep 1884 | 9 | William Samuel Seton | 22 May 1837 | 5 Mar 1914 | 76 | |
5 Mar 1914 | 10 | John Hastings Seton | 20 Sep 1888 | 21 Jun 1956 | 67 | |
21 Jun 1956 | 11 | Robert James Seton | 20 Apr 1926 | 29 Oct 1993 | 67 | |
29 Oct 1993 | 12 | James Christall Seton | 21 Jan 1913 | 4 Apr 1998 | 85 | |
4 Apr 1998 | 13 | Charles Wallace Seton | 25 Aug 1948 | |||
SETON-STEUART of Allanton, Lanark | ||||||
22 May 1815 | UK | 1 | Henry Steuart For details of the special remainder included in the creation of this baronetcy, see the note at the foot of this page |
20 Oct 1759 | 1836 | 76 |
1836 | 2 | Reginald Macdonald | 15 Apr 1838 | |||
15 Apr 1838 | 3 | Henry James Seton-Steuart | 5 Nov 1812 | 6 Dec 1884 | 72 | |
6 Dec 1884 | 4 | Alan Henry Seton-Steuart | 23 Apr 1856 | 3 Apr 1913 | 56 | |
3 Apr 1913 to 19 Feb 1930 |
5 | Douglas Archibald Seton-Steuart Extinct on his death |
20 Aug 1857 | 19 Feb 1930 | 72 | |
SEYLIARD of Delaware, Kent | ||||||
18 Jun 1661 | E | 1 | John Sylyard | c 1613 | 19 Dec 1667 | |
Dec 1667 | 2 | Thomas Seylyiard | c 1648 | 4 May 1692 | ||
May 1692 | 3 | Thomas Seylyiard | c 1673 | 11 Jan 1701 | ||
Jan 1701 to Sep 1701 |
4 | John Seyliard Extinct on his death |
25 Jul 1700 | 23 Sep 1701 | 1 | |
SEYMOUR of Berry Pomeroy, Devon | ||||||
29 Jun 1611 | E | 1 | Edward Seymour MP for Devon 1590, 1601 and 1604‑1611 |
c 1563 | 11 Apr 1613 | |
11 Apr 1613 | 2 | Edward Seymour MP for Penryn 1601, Newport 1604‑1611, Lyme Regis 1614, Devon 1621‑1622, Callington 1624‑1625 and Totnes 1625 |
c 1580 | 5 Oct 1659 | ||
5 Oct 1659 | 3 | Edward Seymour MP for Devon 1640, 1640‑1644 and 1660, and Totnes 1661‑1687 |
10 Sep 1610 | 7 Dec 1688 | 78 | |
7 Dec 1688 | 4 | Edward Seymour MP for Hindon 1661‑1679, Devon 1679, Totnes 1679‑1681 and 1695‑1698, and Exeter 1685‑1695 and 1698‑1708; Treasurer of the Navy 1673‑1681; PC 1679 |
1633 | 17 Feb 1708 | 74 | |
17 Feb 1708 | 5 | Edward Seymour MP for West Looe 1690‑1695, Totnes 1708‑1710 and Great Bedwyn 1710‑1715 |
18 Dec 1663 | 29 Dec 1740 | 77 | |
29 Dec 1740 | 6 | Edward Seymour He subsequently succeeded to the Dukedom of Somerset in 1750 with which title the baronetcy remains merged |
17 Jan 1695 | 15 Dec 1757 | 62 | |
SEYMOUR of Langley, Bucks | ||||||
4 Jul 1681 to Apr 1714 |
E | 1 | Henry Seymour MP for East Looe 1699‑1713 Extinct on his death |
20 Oct 1674 | Apr 1714 | 39 |
SEYMOUR of High Mount, Limerick | ||||||
31 May 1809 | UK | See "Culme-Seymour" | ||||
SEYMOUR of the Army | ||||||
28 Oct 1869 | UK | 1 | Francis Seymour | 2 Aug 1813 | 10 Jul 1890 | 76 |
10 Jul 1890 to 2 May 1949 |
2 | Albert Victor Francis Seymour Extinct on his death |
1 Dec 1887 | 2 May 1949 | 61 | |
SHAEN of Kilmore, Roscommon | ||||||
7 Feb 1663 | I | 1 | James Shaen MP [I] for Baltinglass 1692‑1693 and 1695 |
by 1629 | 13 Dec 1695 | |
13 Dec 1695 to 24 Jun 1725 |
2 | Arthur Shaen MP [I] for Lismore 1692‑1693, 1695‑1699 and 1703‑1725 Extinct on his death |
after 1650 | 24 Jun 1725 | ||
SHAKERLEY of Somerford Hall, Cheshire | ||||||
30 Jul 1838 | UK | 1 | Charles Peter Shakerley | 27 Dec 1792 | 14 Sep 1857 | 64 |
14 Sep 1857 | 2 | Charles Watkin Shakerley | 27 Mar 1833 | 20 Oct 1898 | 65 | |
20 Oct 1898 | 3 | Walter Geoffrey Shakerley | 26 Nov 1859 | 11 Jan 1943 | 83 | |
11 Jan 1943 | 4 | George Herbert Shakerley | 27 Sep 1863 | 7 Aug 1945 | 81 | |
7 Aug 1945 | 5 | Cyril Holland Shakerley | 28 Feb 1897 | 21 Aug 1970 | 73 | |
21 Aug 1970 | 6 | Geoffrey Adam Shakerley | 9 Dec 1932 | 3 Dec 2012 | 79 | |
3 Dec 2012 | 7 | Nicholas Simon Adam Shakerley | 20 Dec 1963 | |||
SHAKESPEARE of Lakenham, Norfolk | ||||||
11 Jul 1942 | UK | 1 | Geoffrey Hithersay Shakespeare MP for Wellingborough 1922‑1923 and Norwich 1929‑1945; PC 1945 |
23 Sep 1893 | 8 Sep 1980 | 86 |
8 Sep 1980 | 2 | William Geoffrey Shakespeare | 12 Oct 1927 | 12 Mar 1996 | 68 | |
12 Mar 1996 | 3 | Thomas William Shakespeare | 11 May 1966 | |||
SHARP of Scotscraig, Fife | ||||||
21 Apr 1683 | NS | See "Bethune" | ||||
SHARP of Heckmondwike, Yorks | ||||||
28 Jun 1920 | UK | 1 | Milton Sheridan Sharp | 30 Jan 1856 | 22 May 1924 | 68 |
22 May 1924 | 2 | Milton Sharp | 22 Apr 1880 | 17 Dec 1941 | 61 | |
17 Dec 1941 | 3 | Milton Reginald Sharp | 21 Nov 1909 | 4 May 1996 | 86 | |
4 May 1996 | 4 | Sheridan Christopher Robin Sharp | 25 Apr 1936 | 4 Dec 2014 | 78 | |
4 Dec 2014 | 5 | Fabian Alexander Sebastian Sharp | 5 Nov 1973 | |||
SHARP of Warden Court, Maidstone, Kent | ||||||
23 Jun 1922 | UK | 1 | Edward Sharp | 13 May 1854 | 23 Aug 1931 | 77 |
23 Aug 1931 | 2 | Herbert Edward Sharp | 25 Apr 1879 | 16 Jun 1936 | 57 | |
16 Jun 1936 | 3 | Edward Herbert Sharp | 3 Dec 1927 | 4 Nov 1985 | 57 | |
4 Nov 1985 | 4 | Adrian Sharp | 17 Sep 1951 | |||
SHAW of Eltham, Kent | ||||||
15 Apr 1665 | E | See "Best-Shaw" | ||||
SHAW of Greenock, Renfrew | ||||||
28 Jun 1687 | NS | 1 | John Shaw | 16 Apr 1693 | ||
16 Apr 1693 | 2 | John Shaw | 16 Apr 1702 | |||
16 Apr 1702 to 5 Apr 1752 |
3 | John Shaw MP for Renfrewshire 1708‑1710 and 1727‑1734, and Clackmannanshire 1722‑1727 Extinct on his death |
c 1679 | 5 Apr 1752 | ||
SHAW of Kilmarnock, Ayr | ||||||
21 Sep 1809 to 22 Oct 1843 |
UK | 1 | James Shaw MP for London 1806‑1818 He obtained a new patent in 1813 - see below Extinct on his death |
26 Aug 1764 | 22 Oct 1843 | 79 |
SHAW of Kilmarnock, Ayr | ||||||
14 Jan 1813 | UK | 1 | Sir James Shaw, 1st baronet For details of the special remainder included in the creation of this baronetcy, see the note at the foot of this page |
26 Aug 1764 | 22 Oct 1843 | 79 |
22 Oct 1843 to 19 Nov 1868 |
2 | John Shaw Extinct on his death |
c 1788 | 19 Nov 1868 | ||
SHAW of Bushy Park, co. Dublin | ||||||
17 Aug 1821 | UK | 1 | Robert Shaw MP [I] for Bannow 1799‑1800; MP for Dublin 1804‑1826 |
29 Jan 1774 | 10 Mar 1849 | 75 |
10 Mar 1849 | 2 | Robert Shaw | 28 Sep 1796 | 19 Feb 1869 | 72 | |
19 Feb 1869 | 3 | Frederick Shaw MP for Dublin 1830‑1831 and 1831‑1832, and Dublin University 1832‑1848; PC [I] 1835 |
11 Dec 1799 | 30 Jun 1876 | 76 | |
30 Jun 1876 | 4 | Robert Shaw | 3 Aug 1821 | 16 May 1895 | 73 | |
16 May 1895 | 5 | Frederick William Shaw | 15 Mar 1858 | 15 Jul 1927 | 69 | |
15 Jul 1927 | 6 | Robert de Vere Shaw | 24 Feb 1890 | 26 Mar 1969 | 79 | |
26 Mar 1969 | 7 | Robert Shaw | 31 Jan 1925 | 18 Dec 2002 | 77 | |
18 Dec 2002 | 8 | Charles de Vere Shaw | 1 Mar 1957 | |||
SHAW of Wolverhampton, Warwicks | ||||||
30 Nov 1908 to 17 Apr 1942 |
UK | 1 | Theodore Frederick Charles Edward Shaw MP for Stafford 1892‑1911 Extinct on his death |
11 Sep 1859 | 17 Apr 1942 | 82 |
SHAW-STEWART of Blackhall and Greenock, Renfrew | ||||||
27 Mar 1667 | NS | 1 | Archibald Stewart | c 1635 | c 1722 | |
c 1722 | 2 | Archibald Stewart | Apr 1724 | |||
Apr 1724 | 3 | Michael Stewart | c 1712 | 20 Oct 1796 | ||
20 Oct 1796 | 4 | John Shaw-Stewart MP for Renfrewshire 1780‑1783 and 1786‑1796 |
c 1740 | 7 Aug 1812 | ||
7 Aug 1812 | 5 | Michael Shaw-Stewart Lord Lieutenant Renfrew 1822‑1825 |
10 Feb 1766 | 25 Aug 1825 | 59 | |
25 Aug 1825 | 6 | Michael Shaw-Stewart MP for Lanarkshire 1827‑1830 and Renfrewshire 1830‑1837 |
4 Oct 1788 | 19 Dec 1836 | 48 | |
19 Dec 1836 | 7 | Michael Robert Shaw-Stewart MP for Renfrewshire 1855‑1865; Lord Lieutenant Renfrew 1869‑1903 |
26 Nov 1826 | 10 Dec 1903 | 77 | |
10 Dec 1903 | 8 | Michael Hugh Shaw-Stewart MP for Renfrewshire East 1886‑1906; Lord Lieutenant Renfrew 1922‑1942 |
11 Jul 1854 | 29 Jun 1942 | 87 | |
29 Jun 1942 | 9 | Walter Guy Shaw-Stewart Lord Lieutenant Renfrew 1950‑1967 |
10 Aug 1892 | 26 Apr 1976 | 83 | |
26 Apr 1976 | 10 | Euan Guy Shaw-Stewart | 11 Oct 1928 | 30 Jan 1980 | 51 | |
30 Jan 1980 | 11 | Houston Mark Shaw-Stewart | 24 Apr 1931 | 21 Feb 2004 | 72 | |
21 Feb 2004 | 12 | Ludovic Houston Shaw-Stewart | 12 Nov 1986 | |||
SHEAFFE of Boston, Massachusetts | ||||||
16 Jan 1813 to 17 Jul 1851 |
UK | 1 | Roger Hale Sheaffe Extinct on his death |
15 Jul 1763 | 17 Jul 1851 | 88 |
SHEE of Dunmore, Galway | ||||||
22 Jan 1794 | I | 1 | George Shee MP [I] for Knocktopher 1798‑1800 |
Jan 1754 | 3 Feb 1825 | 71 |
3 Feb 1825 to 25 Jan 1870 |
2 | George Shee Extinct on his death |
14 Jun 1785 | 25 Jan 1870 | 84 | |
SHEFFIELD of Normanby, Lincs | ||||||
1 Mar 1755 | GB | 1 | Charles Sheffield | c 1706 | 5 Sep 1774 | |
5 Sep 1774 | 2 | John Sheffield | c 1743 | 4 Feb 1815 | ||
4 Feb 1815 | 3 | Robert Sheffield | c 1758 | 26 Feb 1815 | ||
26 Feb 1815 | 4 | Robert Sheffield | 25 Feb 1786 | 7 Nov 1862 | 76 | |
7 Nov 1862 | 5 | Robert Sheffield | 8 Dec 1823 | 23 Oct 1886 | 62 | |
23 Oct 1886 | 6 | Berkeley Digby George Sheffield MP for Brigg 1907‑1910 and 1922‑1929 |
19 Jan 1876 | 26 Nov 1946 | 70 | |
26 Nov 1946 | 7 | Robert Arthur Sheffield | 18 Oct 1905 | 2 Jun 1977 | 71 | |
2 Jun 1977 | 8 | Reginald Adrian Berkeley Sheffield | 9 May 1946 | |||
SHELLEY of Michelgrove, Sussex | ||||||
22 May 1611 | E | 1 | John Shelley | c 1644 | ||
c 1644 | 2 | Charles Shelley | 1681 | |||
1681 | 3 | John Shelley | after 1662 | 25 Apr 1703 | ||
25 Apr 1703 | 4 | John Shelley MP for Arundel 1727‑1741 and Lewes 1743‑1747 |
6 Mar 1692 | 6 Sep 1771 | 79 | |
6 Sep 1771 | 5 | John Shelley MP for East Retford 1751‑1768 and Newark 1768‑1774; PC 1766 |
c 1730 | 11 Sep 1783 | ||
11 Sep 1783 | 6 | John Shelley MP for Helston 1806 and Lewes 1816‑1831 |
3 Mar 1772 | 28 Mar 1852 | 80 | |
28 Mar 1852 | 7 | John Villiers Shelley MP for Gatton 1830‑1831, Grimsby 1831 and Westminster 1852‑1865 |
18 Mar 1808 | 28 Jan 1867 | 58 | |
28 Jan 1867 | 8 | Frederic Shelley | 5 May 1809 | 19 Mar 1869 | 59 | |
19 Mar 1869 | 9 | John Shelley | 31 Aug 1848 | 29 Mar 1931 | 82 | |
29 Mar 1931 | 10 | John Frederick Shelley | 14 Oct 1884 | 8 Mar 1976 | 91 | |
8 Mar 1976 | 11 | John Richard Shelley | 18 Jan 1943 | |||
SHELLEY of Castle Goring, Sussex | ||||||
3 Mar 1806 | UK | 1 | Bysshe Shelley | 12 Jun 1731 | 6 Jan 1815 | 83 |
6 Jan 1815 | 2 | Timothy Shelley | Sep 1753 | 24 Apr 1844 | 90 | |
24 Apr 1844 | 3 | Percy Florence Shelley | 12 Nov 1819 | 5 Dec 1889 | 70 | |
5 Dec 1889 | 4 | Edward Shelley | 10 Dec 1827 | 17 Sep 1890 | 62 | |
17 Sep 1890 | 5 | Charles Shelley | 14 May 1838 | 20 Jul 1902 | 64 | |
20 Jul 1902 | 6 | John Courtown Edward Shelley (Shelley-Rolls from 1917) | 5 Aug 1871 | 18 Feb 1951 | 79 | |
18 Feb 1951 | 7 | Percy Bysshe Shelley | 24 Jun 1872 | 24 Sep 1953 | 81 | |
24 Sep 1953 | 8 | Sidney Patrick Shelley | 18 Jan 1880 | 25 Jul 1965 | 85 | |
25 Jul 1965 | 9 | William Philip Sidney VC He had previously been created Viscount de L'Isle in 1956 with which title the baronetcy remains merged |
23 May 1909 | 5 Apr 1991 | 81 | |
SHELLEY-SIDNEY of Penshurst Place, Kent | ||||||
12 Dec 1818 | UK | 1 | John Shelley-Sidney | 18 Dec 1771 | 14 Mar 1849 | 77 |
14 Mar 1849 | 2 | Philip Charles Sidney He had previously been created Baron de L'Isle & Dudley in 1835 with which title the baronetcy remains merged |
11 Mar 1800 | 4 Mar 1851 | 50 | |
SHEPPARD of Thornton Hall, Bucks | ||||||
29 Sep 1809 | UK | 1 | Thomas Sheppard | 21 Nov 1821 | ||
21 Nov 1821 to 5 Apr 1848 |
2 | Thomas Sheppard-Cotton Extinct on his death |
3 Mar 1785 | 5 Apr 1848 | 63 | |
SHEPPERSON of Upwood, Hunts | ||||||
20 Jun 1945 to 22 Aug 1949 |
UK | 1 | Sir Ernest Whittome Shepperson MP for Leominster 1922‑1945 Extinct on his death |
4 Oct 1874 | 22 Aug 1949 | 74 |
SHERARD of Lopthorp, Lincs | ||||||
25 May 1674 | E | 1 | John Sherard | c 1662 | 1 Jan 1725 | |
1 Jan 1725 | 2 | Richard Sherard | c 1666 | 14 Jun 1730 | ||
14 Jun 1730 | 3 | Brownlow Sherard | 7 Feb 1668 | 30 Jan 1736 | 67 | |
30 Jan 1736 to 25 Nov 1748 |
4 | Brownlow Sherard Extinct on his death |
c 1702 | 25 Nov 1748 | ||
SHERBURNE of Stonyhurst, Lancs | ||||||
4 Feb 1686 to 14 Dec 1717 |
E | 1 | Nicholas Sherburne Extinct on his death |
14 Dec 1717 | ||
SHERSTON-BAKER of Dunstable House, Surrey | ||||||
14 May 1796 | GB | 1 | Robert Baker | 20 Apr 1754 | 4 Feb 1826 | 71 |
4 Feb 1826 | 2 | Henry Loraine Baker | 3 Jan 1787 | 2 Nov 1859 | 72 | |
2 Nov 1859 | 3 | Henry Williams Baker | 27 May 1821 | 12 Feb 1877 | 55 | |
12 Feb 1877 | 4 | George Edward Dundas Sherston Baker | 19 May 1846 | 15 Mar 1923 | 76 | |
15 Mar 1923 | 5 | Dodington George Richard Sherston-Baker | 22 Jul 1877 | 18 Nov 1944 | 67 | |
18 Nov 1944 | 6 | Humphrey Dodington Benedict Sherston-Baker | 13 Oct 1907 | 15 Feb 1990 | 82 | |
15 Feb 1990 | 7 | Robert George Humphrey Sherston-Baker | 3 Apr 1951 | |||
SHIERS of Slyfield, Surrey | ||||||
16 Oct 1684 to 18 Jul 1685 |
E | 1 | George Shiers Extinct on his death |
c 1660 | 18 Jul 1685 | |
SHIFFNER of Coombe Place, Sussex | ||||||
16 Dec 1818 | UK | 1 | George Shiffner | 17 Nov 1762 | Feb 1842 | 79 |
Feb 1842 | 2 | Henry Shiffner | 4 Nov 1788 | 18 Mar 1859 | 70 | |
18 Mar 1859 | 3 | George Shiffner | 17 May 1791 | 14 Dec 1863 | 72 | |
14 Dec 1863 | 4 | George Croxton Shiffner | 21 Aug 1819 | 23 Jan 1906 | 86 | |
23 Jan 1906 | 5 | John Shiffner For information on the death of this baronet, see the note at the foot of this page |
8 Aug 1857 | 5 Apr 1914 | 56 | |
5 Apr 1914 | 6 | John Bridger Shiffner | 5 Aug 1899 | 24 Sep 1918 | 19 | |
24 Sep 1918 | 7 | Henry Burrowes Shiffner | 29 Jul 1902 | 22 Nov 1941 | 39 | |
22 Nov 1941 | 8 | Henry David Shiffner For information on this baronet, see the note at the foot of this page |
2 Feb 1930 | 22 Aug 2018 | 88 | |
22 Aug 2018 | 9 | Michael George Edward Shiffner | 5 Mar 1963 | |||
SHIRLEY of Staunton Harold, Leics | ||||||
22 May 1611 | E | 1 | George Shirley | 23 Apr 1559 | 27 Apr 1622 | 63 |
27 Apr 1622 | 2 | Henry Shirley | c 1588 | 8 Feb 1633 | ||
8 Feb 1633 | 3 | Charles Shirley | 9 Sep 1623 | 7 Jun 1646 | 22 | |
7 Jun 1646 | 4 | Robert Shirley | 1629 | 6 Nov 1656 | 27 | |
6 Nov 1656 | 5 | Seymour Shirley | 23 Jan 1647 | 16 Jul 1667 | 20 | |
Jan 1668 | 6 | Robert Shirley | Jan 1668 | 11 Mar 1669 | 1 | |
Mar 1669 | 7 | Robert Shirley He was subsequently created Earl Ferrers in 1711 with which title the baronetcy remains merged |
20 Oct 1650 | 25 Dec 1717 | 67 | |
SHIRLEY of Preston, Sussex | ||||||
6 Mar 1666 | E | 1 | Anthony Shirley MP for Arundel 1654‑1655, Sussex 1656‑1658 and Steyning 1659 |
5 Jul 1624 | 22 Jun 1683 | 58 |
Jun 1683 | 2 | Richard Shirley | c 1655 | 30 Mar 1692 | ||
Mar 1692 to 1705 |
3 | Richard Shirley Extinct on his death |
c 1680 | 1705 | ||
SHIRLEY of Oat Hall, Sussex | ||||||
27 Jun 1786 | GB | 1 | Thomas Shirley Governor of the Bahamas 1767, Dominica 1774 and the Leeward Islands 1781 |
30 Dec 1727 | 18 Feb 1800 | 72 |
18 Feb 1800 to 26 Feb 1815 |
2 | William Warden Shirley Extinct on his death |
4 Aug 1772 | 26 Feb 1815 | 42 | |
SHORE of Heathcote, Derby | ||||||
27 Oct 1792 | GB | 1 | John Shore He was subsequently created Baron Teignmouth in 1798 with which title the baronetcy then merged until its extinction in 1981 |
5 Oct 1751 | 14 Feb 1834 | 82 |
SHUCKBURGH of Shuckburgh, Warwicks | ||||||
25 Jun 1660 | E | 1 | John Shuckburgh | 1635 | 1661 | 26 |
1661 | 2 | Charles Shuckburgh MP for Warwickshire 1698‑1705 |
Nov 1659 | 2 Sep 1705 | 45 | |
2 Sep 1705 | 3 | John Shuckburgh | 18 Aug 1683 | 19 Jun 1724 | 40 | |
19 Jun 1724 | 4 | Stewkley Shuckburgh | 9 Mar 1711 | 10 Mar 1759 | 48 | |
10 Mar 1759 | 5 | Charles Shuckburgh | 17 Mar 1722 | 10 Aug 1773 | 51 | |
10 Aug 1773 | 6 | George Augustus William Shuckburgh (Shuckburgh‑Evelyn from Jul 1793) MP for Warwickshire 1780‑1804 |
23 Aug 1751 | 11 Aug 1804 | 52 | |
11 Aug 1804 | 7 | Stewkley Shuckburgh | c 1760 | 21 Jul 1809 | ||
21 Jul 1809 | 8 | Francis Shuckburgh | 12 Mar 1789 | 29 Oct 1876 | 87 | |
29 Oct 1876 | 9 | George Thomas Francis Shuckburgh | 23 Jul 1829 | 12 Jan 1884 | 54 | |
12 Jan 1884 | 10 | Stewkley Frederick Draycott Shuckburgh | 20 Jun 1880 | 17 Nov 1917 | 37 | |
17 Nov 1917 | 11 | Gerald Francis Stewkley Shuckburgh | 28 Feb 1882 | 3 Aug 1939 | 57 | |
3 Aug 1939 | 12 | Charles Gerald Stewkley Shuckburgh | 28 Feb 1911 | 4 May 1988 | 77 | |
4 May 1988 | 13 | Rupert Charles Gerald Shuckburgh | 12 Feb 1949 | 24 Jan 2012 | 62 | |
24 Jan 2012 | 14 | James Rupert Charles Shuckburgh | 4 Jan 1978 | |||
SHUTTLEWORTH of Gawthorpe Hall, Lancs | ||||||
22 Dec 1849 | UK | See "Kay-Shuttleworth" | ||||
SIBBALD of Rankelour, Fife | ||||||
24 Jul 1630 | NS | 1 | James Sibbald | 21 May 1650 | ||
21 May 1650 to c 1680 |
2 | David Sibbald On his death the baronetcy became dormant |
c 1680 | |||
SIDNEY of Penshurst, Kent | ||||||
12 Dec 1818 | UK | See "Shelley-Sidney" | ||||
SILVESTER of Yardley | ||||||
20 May 1815 to 30 Mar 1822 |
UK | 1 | John Silvester He was granted a fresh patent in 1822 - see below Extinct on his death |
Sep 1745 | 30 Mar 1822 | 76 |
SILVESTER of Yardley | ||||||
11 Feb 1822 | UK | 1 | Sir John Silvester, 1st baronet | Sep 1745 | 30 Mar 1822 | 76 |
30 Mar 1822 to Aug 1828 |
2 | Philip Carteret Silvester Extinct on his death |
Aug 1828 | |||
SIMEON of Chilworth, Oxon | ||||||
18 Oct 1677 | E | 1 | James Simeon | 15 Jan 1709 | ||
15 Jan 1709 to 22 Dec 1768 |
2 | Edward Simeon Extinct on his death |
c 1682 | 22 Dec 1768 | ||
SIMEON of Grazeley, Berks | ||||||
22 May 1815 | UK | 1 | John Simeon | 4 Feb 1824 | ||
4 Feb 1824 | 2 | Richard Godin Simeon MP for Isle of Wight 1832‑1837 |
21 May 1784 | 4 Jan 1854 | 69 | |
4 Jan 1854 | 3 | John Simeon MP for Isle of Wight 1847‑1851 |
5 Feb 1815 | 21 May 1870 | 55 | |
21 May 1870 | 4 | John Stephen Barrington Simeon MP for Southampton 1895‑1906 |
31 Aug 1850 | 26 Apr 1909 | 58 | |
26 Apr 1909 | 5 | Edmund Charles Simeon | 11 Dec 1855 | 18 Jun 1915 | 59 | |
18 Jun 1915 | 6 | John Walter Barrington Simeon | Jan 1886 | 24 Jun 1957 | 71 | |
24 Jun 1957 | 7 | John Edmund Barrington Simeon | 1 Mar 1911 | 6 Dec 1999 | 88 | |
6 Dec 1999 | 8 | Richard Edmund Barrington Simeon | 2 Mar 1943 | 11 Oct 2013 | 70 | |
11 Oct 2013 | 9 | Stephen George Barrington Simeon | 29 Oct 1970 | |||
SIMPSON of Strathavon, Linlithgow | ||||||
3 Feb 1866 | UK | 1 | James Young Simpson | 7 Jun 1811 | 5 May 1870 | 58 |
5 May 1870 | 2 | Walter Grindlay Simpson | 1 Sep 1843 | 29 May 1898 | 54 | |
29 May 1898 to 16 Mar 1924 |
3 | James Walter Mackay Simpson Extinct on his death |
6 Sep 1882 | 16 Mar 1924 | 41 | |
SIMPSON of Bradley Hall, Durham | ||||||
1 Feb 1935 | UK | 1 | Frank Robert Simpson | 12 Apr 1864 | 29 Apr 1949 | 85 |
29 Apr 1949 | 2 | Basil Robert James Simpson | 13 Feb 1898 | 19 Aug 1968 | 70 | |
19 Aug 1968 to 21 Dec 1981 |
3 | John Cyril Finucane Simpson Extinct on his death |
10 Feb 1899 | 21 Dec 1981 | 82 | |
SINCLAIR of Dunbeath, Caithness | ||||||
3 Jan 1631 to c 1652 |
NS | 1 | John Sinclair Extinct on his death |
c 1652 | ||
SINCLAIR of Canisbay, Caithness | ||||||
2 Jun 1631 | NS | 1 | James Sinclair | 1662 | ||
1662 | 2 | William Sinclair | c 1677 | |||
c 1677 | 3 | James Sinclair | c 1710 | |||
c 1710 | 4 | James Sinclair | c 1730 | |||
c 1730 | 5 | James Sinclair | 4 Oct 1760 | |||
4 Oct 1760 | 6 | John Sinclair | Apr 1774 | |||
Apr 1774 | 7 | James Sinclair He subsequently succeeded to the Earldom of Caithness in 1789 with which title the baronetcy remains merged |
31 Oct 1766 | 16 Jul 1823 | 56 | |
SINCLAIR of Longformacus, Berwick | ||||||
10 Dec 1664 | NS | 1 | Robert Sinclair | 1678 | ||
1678 | 2 | John Sinclair | after 1696 | |||
after 1696 | 3 | Robert Sinclair | 28 Sep 1727 | |||
28 Sep 1727 | 4 | John Sinclair | 5 Dec 1764 | |||
5 Dec 1764 | 5 | Harry Sinclair | 25 Jun 1768 | |||
25 Jun 1768 | 6 | John Sinclair | 7 Jan 1798 | |||
7 Jan 1798 to c 1843 |
7 | John Sinclair On his death the baronetcy became either extinct or dormant |
c 1843 | |||
SINCLAIR of Kinnaird, Fife | ||||||
c 1675 | NS | 1 | James Sinclair | c 1702 | ||
c 1702 | 2 | George Sinclair | 1726 | |||
1726 | 3 | John Sinclair | 25 Dec 1767 | |||
25 Dec 1767 | 4 | John Sinclair Nothing further is known of him or his successors (if any) |
1763 | |||
SINCLAIR of Dunbeath, Caithness | ||||||
12 Oct 1704 | NS | 1 | James Sinclair | 28 Sep 1742 | ||
28 Sep 1742 | 2 | William Sinclair | 2 Aug 1767 | |||
2 Aug 1767 | 3 | Alexander Sinclair | 1786 | |||
1786 | 4 | Benjamin Sinclair | 26 Oct 1796 | |||
26 Oct 1796 | 5 | John Sinclair | 1 Oct 1842 | |||
1 Oct 1842 | 6 | John Sinclair | 16 Sep 1794 | 21 Apr 1873 | 78 | |
21 Apr 1873 | 7 | John Rose George Sinclair | 10 Aug 1864 | 3 Nov 1926 | 62 | |
3 Nov 1926 | 8 | Ronald Norman John Charles Udny Sinclair | 30 Jun 1899 | 19 Oct 1952 | 53 | |
19 Oct 1952 | 9 | John Rollo Norman Blair Sinclair | 4 Nov 1928 | 10 Mar 1990 | 62 | |
10 Mar 1990 | 10 | Patrick Robert Richard Sinclair | 21 May 1936 | 5 Mar 2011 | 74 | |
5 Mar 2011 | 11 | William Robert Francis Sinclair | 27 Mar 1979 | |||
SINCLAIR of Ulbster, Caithness | ||||||
14 Feb 1786 | GB | 1 | John Sinclair For information on the special remainder included in this creation, see the note at the foot of this page MP for Caithness 1780‑1784, 1790‑1796, 1802‑1806 and 1807‑1811, Lostwithiel 1784‑1790 and Petersfield 1797‑1802 |
10 May 1754 | 21 Dec 1835 | 81 |
21 Dec 1835 | 2 | George Sinclair MP for Caithness 1811‑1812, 1818‑1820 and 1831‑1841 |
23 Aug 1790 | 9 Oct 1868 | 78 | |
9 Oct 1868 | 3 | John George Tollemache Sinclair MP for Caithness 1869‑1885 For further information on this baronet, see the note at the foot of this page |
8 Nov 1824 | 29 Sep 1912 | 87 | |
29 Sep 1912 | 4 | Archibald Henry Macdonald Sinclair He was subsequently created Viscount Thurso in 1952 with which title the baronetcy then merged |
22 Oct 1890 | 15 Jun 1970 | 79 | |
SINCLAIR-LOCKHART of Stevenston, Haddington | ||||||
18 Jun 1636 | NS | 1 | John Sinclair | 1649 | ||
1649 | 2 | John Sinclair | 26 Jul 1642 | 1652 | 9 | |
1652 | 3 | Robert Sinclair | 15 Oct 1643 | Jul 1713 | 69 | |
Jul 1713 | 4 | John Sinclair | 1726 | |||
1726 | 5 | Robert Sinclair | 25 Oct 1754 | |||
25 Oct 1754 | 6 | John Sinclair | 13 Feb 1789 | |||
13 Feb 1789 | 7 | Robert Sinclair | 4 Aug 1795 | |||
4 Aug 1795 | 8 | John Gordon Sinclair | 31 Jul 1790 | 12 Nov 1863 | 73 | |
12 Nov 1863 | 9 | Robert Charles Sinclair | 25 Aug 1820 | 5 May 1899 | 78 | |
5 May 1899 | 10 | Graeme Alexander Sinclair-Lockhart | 23 Jan 1820 | 20 Mar 1904 | 84 | |
20 Mar 1904 | 11 | Robert Duncan Sinclair-Lockhart | 12 Nov 1856 | 8 Nov 1919 | 62 | |
8 Nov 1919 | 12 | Graeme Duncan Power Sinclair-Lockhart | 29 Jan 1897 | 15 Feb 1959 | 62 | |
15 Feb 1959 | 13 | John Beresford Sinclair-Lockhart | 4 Nov 1904 | 11 Mar 1970 | 65 | |
11 Mar 1970 | 14 | Muir Edward Sinclair-Lockhart | 23 Jul 1906 | 10 Feb 1985 | 78 | |
10 Feb 1985 | 15 | Simon John Edward Francis Sinclair-Lockhart | 22 Jul 1941 | |||
SITWELL of Renishaw, Derby | ||||||
3 Oct 1808 | UK | 1 | Sitwell Sitwell MP for West Looe 1796‑1802 |
14 Jul 1811 | ||
14 Jul 1811 | 2 | George Sitwell | 20 Apr 1797 | 12 Mar 1853 | 55 | |
12 Mar 1853 | 3 | Sitwell Reresby Sitwell | 6 Oct 1820 | 12 Apr 1862 | 41 | |
12 Apr 1862 | 4 | George Reresby Sitwell MP for Scarborough 1885‑1886 and 1892‑1895 For further information on this baronet, see the note at the foot of this page |
27 Jan 1860 | 8 Jul 1948 | 88 | |
8 Jul 1948 | 5 | (Francis) Osbert Sacheverell Sitwell CH 1958 |
6 Dec 1892 | 4 May 1969 | 76 | |
4 May 1969 | 6 | Sacheverell Sitwell CH 1984 |
15 Nov 1897 | 1 Oct 1988 | 90 | |
1 Oct 1988 | 7 | Sacheverell Reresby Sitwell | 15 Apr 1927 | 31 Mar 2009 | 81 | |
31 Mar 2009 | 8 | George Reresby Sacheverell Sitwell | 22 Apr 1967 | |||
SKEFFINGTON of Fisherwick, Staffs | ||||||
8 May 1627 | E | 1 | William Skeffington | 16 Sep 1635 | ||
Sep 1635 | 2 | John Skeffington MP for Newcastle under Lyme 1626 |
c 1590 | 19 Nov 1651 | ||
19 Nov 1651 | 3 | William Skeffington | 7 Apr 1652 | |||
Apr 1652 | 4 | John Skeffington He subsequently succeeded to the Viscountcy of Massereene in 1665 with which title the baronetcy then merged until its extinction in 1816 |
21 Jun 1695 | |||
SKEFFINGTON of Skeffington, Leics | ||||||
27 Jun 1786 | GB | 1 | William Charles Farrell-Skeffington | 24 Jun 1742 | 26 Jan 1815 | 72 |
26 Jan 1815 to 10 Nov 1850 |
2 | Lumley St. George Skeffington Extinct on his death |
23 Mar 1771 | 10 Nov 1850 | 79 | |
SKENE of Curriehill | ||||||
22 Feb 1628 | NS | 1 | James Skene | 10 Oct 1633 | ||
10 Oct 1633 to c 1680 |
2 | John Skene On his death the baronetcy became either extinct or dormant |
c 1680 | |||
SKINNER of Pont Street, Chelsea | ||||||
9 Feb 1912 | UK | 1 | Thomas Skinner | 23 Nov 1840 | 11 May 1926 | 85 |
11 May 1926 | 2 | Thomas Hewitt Skinner | 12 Jun 1875 | 4 Oct 1968 | 93 | |
4 Oct 1968 | 3 | Thomas Gordon Skinner | 29 Dec 1899 | 22 Nov 1972 | 72 | |
22 Nov 1972 | 4 | Thomas Keith Hewitt Skinner | 6 Dec 1927 | 18 Oct 2021 | 93 | |
18 Oct 2021 | 5 | Thomas James Hewitt Skinner | 11 Sep 1962 | |||
SKIPWITH of Prestwould, Leics | ||||||
20 Dec 1622 | E | 1 | Henry Skipwith | c 1658 | ||
c 1658 | 2 | Henry Skipwith | c 1616 | c 1663 | ||
c 1663 | 3 | Grey Skipwith | c 1680 | |||
c 1680 | 4 | William Skipwith | c 1670 | c 1730 | ||
c 1730 | 5 | Grey Skipwith | c 1700 | c 1750 | ||
c 1750 | 6 | William Skipwith | 1703 | 26 Feb 1764 | 60 | |
26 Feb 1764 | 7 | Peyton Skipwith | 9 Oct 1805 | |||
9 Oct 1805 | 8 | Grey Skipwith MP for Warwickshire 1831‑1832 and Warwickshire South 1832‑1835 |
17 Sep 1771 | 13 May 1852 | 80 | |
13 May 1852 | 9 | Thomas George Skipwith | 9 Feb 1803 | 30 Nov 1863 | 60 | |
30 Nov 1863 | 10 | Peyton Estoteville Skipwith | 12 Feb 1857 | 12 May 1891 | 34 | |
12 May 1891 | 11 | Gray Humberston d'Estoteville Skipwith | 1 Dec 1884 | 3 Feb 1950 | 65 | |
3 Feb 1950 | 12 | Patrick Alexander d'Estoteville Skipwith | 1 Sep 1938 | 6 Oct 2016 | 78 | |
6 Oct 2016 | 13 | Alexander Sebastian Grey d'Estoteville Skipwith | 9 Apr 1969 | |||
SKIPWITH of Newbold Hall, Warwicks | ||||||
25 Oct 1670 | E | 1 | Fulwar Skipwith | 18 Nov 1677 | ||
18 Nov 1677 | 2 | Fulwar Skipwith MP for Coventry 1713‑1715 |
24 Jun 1676 | 14 May 1728 | 51 | |
14 May 1728 | 3 | Francis Skipwith | c 1705 | 6 Dec 1778 | ||
6 Dec 1778 to 28 Jan 1790 |
4 | Thomas George Skipwith MP for Warwickshire 1769‑1780 and Steyning 1780‑1784 Extinct on his death |
c 1735 | 28 Jan 1790 | ||
SKIPWITH of Metheringham, Lincs | ||||||
27 Jul 1678 | E | 1 | Thomas Skipwith MP for Grantham 1659 and 1660 |
c 1620 | 2 Jun 1694 | |
2 Jun 1694 | 2 | Thomas Skipwith MP for Malmesbury 1696‑1698 |
c 1652 | 15 Jun 1710 | ||
15 Jun 1710 to 4 Jun 1756 |
3 | George Brydges Skipwith Extinct on his death |
7 Nov 1686 | 4 Jun 1756 | 69 | |
SLADE of Maunsell House, Somerset | ||||||
30 Sep 1831 | UK | 1 | John Slade | 1762 | 13 Aug 1859 | 97 |
13 Aug 1859 | 2 | Frederick William Slade | 21 Jan 1801 | 8 Aug 1863 | 62 | |
8 Aug 1863 | 3 | Alfred Frederic Adolphus Slade For information about the Slade baronetcy case of 1867, see the note at the foot of this page |
28 May 1834 | 19 Jul 1890 | 56 | |
19 Jul 1890 | 4 | Cuthbert Slade | 10 Apr 1863 | 9 Feb 1908 | 44 | |
9 Feb 1908 | 5 | Alfred Fothringham Slade | 17 Jan 1898 | 28 Oct 1960 | 62 | |
28 Oct 1960 | 6 | Michael Nial Slade | 30 Jul 1900 | 15 Apr 1962 | 61 | |
15 Apr 1962 | 7 | Benjamin Julian Alfred Slade For further information regarding this baronet, see the note at the foot of this page |
22 May 1946 | |||
SLANNING of Maristow, Devon | ||||||
19 Jan 1663 | E | 1 | Nicholas Slanning MP for Plympton Erle 1667‑1679 and Penryn 1679‑1689 |
Jun 1643 | c Apr 1691 | |
c Apr 1691 to 21 Nov 1700 |
2 | Andrew Slanning Extinct on his death For information on the death of this baronet, see the note at the foot of this page |
c 1674 | 21 Nov 1700 | ||
SLEIGHT of Weelsby Hall, Lincs | ||||||
29 Jun 1920 | UK | 1 | George Frederick Sleight | 26 Mar 1853 | 19 Mar 1921 | 67 |
19 Mar 1921 | 2 | Ernest Sleight | 14 Oct 1873 | 16 Jul 1946 | 72 | |
16 Jul 1946 | 3 | John Frederick Sleight | 13 Apr 1909 | 12 Feb 1990 | 80 | |
12 Feb 1990 | 4 | Richard Sleight | 27 May 1946 | |||
SLINGSBY of Scriven, Yorks | ||||||
23 Oct 1628 to 1630 |
E | 1 | Anthony Slingsby Extinct on his death |
1630 | ||
SLINGSBY of Scriven, Yorks | ||||||
2 Mar 1638 | NS | 1 | Henry Slingsby MP for Knaresborough 1625, 1640 and 1640‑1642 For further information on the death of this baronet, see the note at the foot of this page |
14 Jan 1602 | 8 Jun 1658 | 56 |
8 Jun 1658 | 2 | Thomas Slingsby MP for Yorkshire 1670‑1679, Knaresborough 1679‑1685 and Scarborough 1685‑1687 |
15 Jun 1636 | 1 Mar 1688 | 51 | |
Mar 1688 | 3 | Henry Slingsby MP for Knaresborough 1685‑1689 |
c 1660 | 15 Sep 1691 | ||
Sep 1691 | 4 | Thomas Slingsby | c 1668 | 15 Nov 1726 | ||
Nov 1726 | 5 | Henry Slingsby MP for Knaresborough 1714‑1715 and 1722‑1763 |
c 1693 | 18 Jan 1763 | ||
18 Jan 1763 | 6 | Thomas Slingsby | c 1695 | 18 Jan 1765 | ||
18 Jan 1765 | 7 | Savile Slingsby | c 1698 | Nov 1780 | ||
Nov 1780 | 8 | Thomas Turner Slingsby | c 1741 | 14 Apr 1806 | ||
14 Apr 1806 | 9 | Thomas Slingsby | 10 Jan 1775 | 26 Feb 1835 | 60 | |
26 Feb 1835 to 4 Feb 1869 |
10 | Charles Slingsby On his death the baronetcy became dormant For further information on the death of this baronet, see the note at the foot of this page |
22 Aug 1824 | 4 Feb 1869 | 44 | |
SLINGSBY of Bifrons, Kent | ||||||
19 Oct 1657 | E | 1 | Arthur Slingsby | c 1623 | 12 Feb 1666 | |
Feb 1666 to after 1677 |
2 | Charles Slingsby On his death the baronetcy is presumed to have become either extinct or dormant |
after 1677 | |||
SLINGSBY of Newcells, Herts | ||||||
16 Mar 1661 to 26 Oct 1661 |
E | 1 | Robert Slingsby Extinct on his death |
c 1611 | 26 Oct 1661 | |
SLOANE of Chelsea, Middlesex | ||||||
3 Apr 1716 to 11 Jan 1753 |
GB | 1 | Hans Sloane Extinct on his death |
10 Apr 1660 | 11 Jan 1753 | 92 |
Sir Henry John Seton, 6th baronet [NS 1663] | ||||||
Sir Henry died in 1868 after being run down by a hansom cab. The following report appeared in the Bury and Norwich Post, and Suffolk Herald on 28 July 1868:- | ||||||
On Wednesday evening [22 July 1868] Mr. St.Clare Bedford, Coroner for Westminster, held an inquest at St.James's Vestry-hall, Piccadilly, on the body of Sir Henry John Seaton [sic], aged 71, who was run over in St.James's-street on the previous Saturday. Mr. R. B. Mackay, an East India merchant, said that on Saturday evening, a little before seven o'clock, he was in a hansom cab driving up St.James's-street, Piccadilly. When opposite the end of King-street he observed deceased endeavouring to cross the street, and shouted to him. He looked at the cab, and seemed to think that he could get across in time, but became confused, and stepped back, and then forward right in front of the horse. The shaft of the cab struck him on the right shoulder, throwing him down in the roadway. The wheel went on him and over his side, but just as it was going over his head the driver pulled up so vigorously as to avert it. Witness jumped out of the cab, and rendered what assistance he could to deceased, whom he found quite insensible, and he was carried in a chair to his rooms in King-street. The driver of the cab was quite sober, and could not have avoided the occurrence. The deceased stepped into the roadway when the cab was so close to him that it was impossible to pull up in time to prevent the accident. | ||||||
Mr. William Friker said he witnessed the whole occurrence, and that the cab was not going faster than six miles an hour. | ||||||
Mr. W. Miller, surgeon, said that he was called to deceased immediately after the accident. He was insensible, but he recovered for a minute and said, "Let me go to the Club." He again became insensible, and never uttered any more words. Two of his ribs were fractured, and he had received a blow on the forehead which had produced concussion of the brain. Everything possible was done for his relief, but he remained insensible throughout Sunday and Monday, and on Tuesday morning he died. | ||||||
Samuel Standen, the driver of the cab, said he did see deceased until he was close to the horse's head. | ||||||
The Coroner having summed up the evidence, the Jury returned a verdict of "Accidental death". | ||||||
Sir Alexander Hay Seton, 10th baronet [NS 1663] | ||||||
The following report appeared in The Irish Times of 29 March 1937:- | ||||||
Sir Alexander Seton, of Edinburgh, believes he and his family are "haunted" by a sacred bone, supposed to carry with it the curse of a Pharaoh. | ||||||
So serious and persistent have been a series of accidents suffered by his family since the bone has been in their possession that Lady Seton is to make a special trip to Egypt shortly to replace the bone in the tomb from which it was acquired last year. | ||||||
Speaking from Edinburgh yesterday, Sir Alexander told the Press Association that since the bone was brought to his home, Prestonfield House, Duddingston, by Lady Seton, their life had been made miserable by accidents that could not be coincidences. | ||||||
He and Lady Seton visited Egypt last year. As a curio Lady Seton brought back a glass case, containing a piece of bone believed to be part of the skeleton of a Pharaoh of one of the lesser dynasties, and the curio was given a place of honour in the lounge. | ||||||
From the moment it was placed there an unprecedented series of happenings occurred in the household. Sudden illnesses attacked the family and staff, two fires broke out, and visitors still complain of a mysterious robed figure which wanders through the house at night. Glassware put away in cabinets was found smashed to atoms in other parts of the room in the morning, and on Saturday, when no-one was near the lounge, the glass case fell only two feet from the table and yet was pounded to splinters while the bone was undamaged. | ||||||
Maids will not stay in the house more than one night, and each complained of meeting the spectral robed figure. | ||||||
"This is the last straw," said Sir Alexander yesterday. "My friends have laughed at the whole affair - until they stayed here a night - and though I have tried to have an open mind this is far more than coincidence. It is perfectly astounding how we have been dogged by this shadow of ill-luck ever since that wretched bone was brought into the house." | ||||||
Sir Alexander, a soldier, business man and diplomat, has received about 80 offers for the bone, but he is determined that no one else shall suffer the experiences of Lady Seton and himself. "That bone is going to be replaced in the tomb we took it from as quickly as possible," he said, "and Lady Seton is making the trip herself to ensure that it gets there. This ghastly business has got to stop, and we are taking no chances." | ||||||
Sir Alexander once gave the bone to a surgeon, and that very night the surgeon's maid broke a leg running away in terror, as she said, from a robed figure. He brought it back next day. | ||||||
Sir James Lumsden Seton, 8th baronet [NS 1683] | ||||||
Sir James committed suicide in September 1884. The following report on the subsequent inquest appeared in the Leeds Mercury on 1 October 1884:- | ||||||
An inquest was held yesterday afternoon at Kensington on the body of Sir James Lumsden Seton, Bart., who had committed suicide by cutting his throat. Lady Elizabeth Seton, wife of the deceased, said Sir James, who was 49 years of age, had lately been in depressed spirits. He went to his bath-room on Sunday morning about eight o'clock, and an hour later, the door being forced, he was found dead. Other evidence showed that the deceased had an extensive gash in his throat. Lieut.-Colonel William Samuel Seton, of Penally, near Denbigh, stated that some years ago the deceased had a fall from his horse, and in consequence had suffered mentally at varying intervals. A verdict of "Suicide whilst in a state of unsound mind" was returned. | ||||||
The special remainder to the baronetcy of Seton-Steuart created in 1815 | ||||||
From the London Gazette of 27 December 1814 (issue 16969, page 2535):- | ||||||
His Royal Highness the Prince Regent has been pleased, in the name and on behalf of His Majesty, to grant the Dignity of a Baronet of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland to Henry Steuart, of Allanton, in the County of Lanark, Esq; with remainder to his son in law, Ranald or Reginald Macdonald, of Stalfa, and his heirs male. | ||||||
The special remainder to the baronetcy of Shaw created in 1813 | ||||||
From the London Gazette (issue 16676, page 2420):- | ||||||
His Royal Highness, the Prince Regent, has been pleased, in the name and on the behalf of His Majesty, to grant the dignity of a Baronet of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland >unto Sir James Shaw, of Kilmarnock in the County of Ayr, and Polmadie, in the Stewartry of Kirkcudbright, and to the heirs male of his body lawfully begotten, with remainder to John Shaw, of Whitehall-place, in the City of Westminster, and of Kilmarnock, in the County of Ayr, Esq., nephew of the said Sir James Shaw, and to the heirs male of his body lawfully begotten. | ||||||
Sir John Shiffner, 5th baronet | ||||||
Sir John accidentally shot himself while cleaning his rifle. The following report of the subsequent inquest is taken from The Times of 7 April 1914:- | ||||||
The death of Sir John Shiffner on Sunday formed the subject of an inquiry at Bevern Bridge House, Chailey, near Lewes, Sir John's residence, yesterday afternoon. The inquiry was held by Dr. Dow, Deputy-Coroner for East Sussex, and Mr. W.W. Grantham, son of the late Mr. Justice Grantham, was foreman of the jury. | ||||||
Lord Calthorpe gave evidence of identification, stating that Sir John Shiffner was a retired captain of the Royal Artillery and was 56 years of age. Lady Shiffner and Miss Betty Shiffner had been staying with the witness, and the latter was returning to Chailey on the evening of the occurrence and Lady Shiffner was to follow at the end of the week. | ||||||
Mr. Douglas Crocket, living at Barcombe, said he was invited to lunch by Sir John Shiffner on Sunday and arrived about 10 minutes past 1. A servant let him in and went to the study. She came running back saying, "Do come here. Whatever has happened?" He went into the study and found Sir John dead with a bullet wound in his face. He locked the room up and hailing the first motor-car which passed the house, drove into Lewes for medical assistance. | ||||||
Police-constable Lyon, of Chailey, said he found Sir John sitting in an arm chair in his study. He had the barrel of a rifle between his legs, and another rifle was lying on the floor. There was a cleaning rag in the right hand and other articles for cleaning rifles were on the floor. In the barrel between the legs was a spent bullet case. It appeared that this had become fixed in the barrel and that an attempt had been made to dislodge it with a screw driver, and then by means of the extractor. This caused the cartridge to explode. | ||||||
Dr. Andrews, of Lewes, said Sir John Shiffner was evidently smoking a pipe at the time, for there was one on the floor at his side. All the evidence, added the witness, suggested that Sir John was cleaning the rifle and was not aware that the cartridge was a live one. | ||||||
The jury returned a verdict of "Accidental death". | ||||||
Sir Henry David Shiffner, 8th baronet [UK 1818] | ||||||
Sir Henry, a member of Sir Oswald Mosley's Union Movement, was prosecuted but eventually acquitted on charges that he, along with others, had set fire to the offices of the Anti-Apartheid movement, a natural enemy of Mosley's followers. | ||||||
The story of Sir Henry's court appearances was told in a number of separate instalments in the London Daily Telegraph, commencing on 29 March 1961:- | ||||||
Witnesses at Clerkenwell yesterday said that after they saw men go into a house in Gower Street, Euston, where the headquarters of the Anti-Apartheid movement are located, they saw flames coming from the basement. | ||||||
Sir Henry David Shiffner, 35 [sic], the eighth baronet of Old School House, Offham, Lewes: Peter Dawson, 35, sales representative, Quaker Street, Spitalfields, and Francis John Elliott, 16, electrical apprentice, Freshwater Road, Tooting, were charged on remand with maliciously setting fire to the house. In addition, there was a further charge yesterday of conspiring together, and with others, to break into the house with intent to commit a felony. The Anti-Apartheid movement occupies the basement of the house. | ||||||
The basement was set on fire on March 4 and furniture and papers damaged. Mr. Ian Holden, of Scotland Yard's forensic laboratory, said the damage was "typical of that resulting from a highly inflammable liquid being poured on articles and ignited." | ||||||
He produced a black oblong tin which he said had contained paraffin. He added: "Something more than paraffin would be needed to start a fire like this." | ||||||
Mr. Theodore Theobalds, a Jamaican solicitor whose address was withheld, said he had let "four or five young men" into the house. They had said they had come to collect posters and he showed them the steps to the basement. At the time he and his wife had a flat in the house. | ||||||
Two of the men were downstairs for about half a minute and then left by the front door. A few seconds later three other men came up and went out. A van had moved off shortly before that. | ||||||
He added: "After they had gone I notice smoke coming from the basement." When he went down he saw: "A mass of flames and a lot of smoke." He could not recognise any of the men. | ||||||
Det. Supt. William Brereton said he had had a telephone call from Shiffner on March 20, whom he later told he was believed to have been involved in a case of arson. Shiffner had replied: "I would not like to be involved in such a stupid escapade as setting fire to a place." | ||||||
Shiffner, when asked if he were in Gower Street, had said: "This is very difficult. I have been wondering where my duty lies. You see, I did find myself in Gower Street that afternoon, but not by choice. When I realised someone had set fire to the place it was my duty to inform the police." | ||||||
Supt. Brereton said that Shiffner added: "But I really only know the hierarchy of the movement, so it would not have been much use. I did not know the others, apart from Dawson, and he did not go into the house." | ||||||
When told he would be charged with arson he said: "That's rather hard after telling you the truth." When charged, he said: "I set fire to nothing." | ||||||
The three were further remanded until April 6. Elliott's bail of £40 and Shiffner's of £200 were continued, and Dawson, previously remanded in custody, was allowed bail on his own bail of £500 and two sureties of £250. | ||||||
The Daily Telegraph of 7 April 1961:- | ||||||
A trip by van through London to the Bloomsbury headquarters of the Anti-Apartheid movement, where fire later broke out, was described in extracts from a statement read at Clerkenwell yesterday. The statement was made by Sir Henry David Shiffner. In it he said he thought he was being driven in the van to the Dorchester, where the South African Prime Minister, Dr. Verwoerd, was staying. | ||||||
Shiffner, 31, the eighth baronet, a company director, of Old School House, Offham, Lewes, appeared on remand with three other men on charges of arson and conspiring to break into a house in Gower Street, Bloomsbury, on March 4, with intent to commit a felony. The basement of the building is occupied by the Anti-Apartheid movement. | ||||||
In the statement, read in court by his counsel, Mr. William Howard, Shiffner said that when he found he had not been taken to the Dorchester, he said: "Where the hell are we?" Someone said: "This is the opposition headquarters. Let's go in and see what their plans are, pretending we are provincial demonstrators arriving late." | ||||||
"I still maintained that we were in the wrong place and acting against strict instructions that we confine our activities to the Dorchester," the statement said. Shiffner said he remained in the van. There was a shout of "Fire", and everyone jumped into the van. It was driven off at "great speed". | ||||||
All four pleaded not guilty and reserved their defence. They were committed for trial at the Old Bailey and all allowed bail. | ||||||
The Daily Telegraph of 10 May 1961:- | ||||||
Sir Henry Shiffner, 31, the eighth baronet and a member of Sir Oswald Mosley's Union movement, was acquitted at the Old Bailey yesterday of maliciously setting fire to the London headquarters of the Anti-Apartheid movement. | ||||||
Outside the court Sir Henry said: "Whether or not I remain a member of the Union movement depends on talks I must have with the leader. I have planned a meeting with him very soon." | ||||||
Sir Henry, a former Cambridge University jazz band player, was discharged on the second day of his trial after a successful submission by his counsel, Mr. Victor Durand QC that there was no case for him to answer. | ||||||
The crown had alleged that Sir Henry and three other members of the Union movement had arranged to take part in a demonstration on March 4 to welcome Dr. Verwoerd, the South African Premier, to London. | ||||||
Later that afternoon, according to the prosecution, the four men went in a van to the headquarters of the Anti-Apartheid movement in Gower Street, Bloomsbury, and set light to its basement offices. | ||||||
In a statement to the police Sir Henry had said that he thought the van was going to the Dorchester Hotel. At Gower Street, he just sat in the van and only later realised something more serious had happened. | ||||||
After Mr. Durand's successful submission Sir Henry was discharged by Mr. Justice Widgery. | ||||||
Sir Henry, of Old School House, Offham, near Arundel, Sussex, who inherited £70,000 from his father, a soldier, who was killed at Tobruk, said afterwards: "I first went to Africa 18 months ago and came back with certain views. I felt the withdrawal of British rule in Africa was wrong. Sir Oswald Mosley's Union movement seemed to me the only one which was prepared to stand up for the white man in Africa. I joined it six months ago and paid the normal subscription. I am disillusioned by the movement's methods, although I agree with some of their policies, especially about the control of coloured immigrants. Sir Oswald is a personal and social friend of mine and that is another reason why I joined his movement. I think I'm the only British baronet in it." | ||||||
The special remainder to the baronetcy of Sinclair created in 1786 | ||||||
From the London Gazette of 31 January 1786 (issue 12722, page 45):- | ||||||
The King has been pleased to grant the Dignity of a Baronet of the Kingdom of Great Britain to John Sinclair, of Ulbster in the County of Caithness, Esq; and the Heirs Male of his Body lawfully begotten; with Remainders severally to the first and every other Son and Sons successively of Hannah Sinclair, his eldest Daughter, and of Janet Sinclair, another of his Daughters, and their respective Heirs Male. | ||||||
Sir John George Tollemache Sinclair, 3rd baronet [GB 1786] | ||||||
After the death of Sir John Sinclair, the following article appeared in the Washington Post on 5 October 1912:- | ||||||
Sir Archibald Sinclair, 22 years of age, a lieutenant in the Second life guards, and who is half American, has just succeeded to the title and the immense estates of his nonagenarian grandfather, the late Sir John Tollemache Sinclair. [Sir Archibald later became the 1st Viscount Thurso.] | ||||||
The landed property is very great, extending over an area of 100 square miles in Scotland, comprising some of the finest shooting in the northern kingdom, and the wonderfully picturesque castle of Thurso, which looks over the stormy tides of the Pentland Firth, and is so close to the sea that one can literally fish from the spray-flecked windows. | ||||||
Just east of the castle, which is exceedingly spacious, is Harold's Tower, containing the tomb of Earl Harold, who was the possessor at one time of half or Orkney, of Shetland, and of Caithness, and who fell in battle against his namesake, Earl Harold the Wicked, in 1190. | ||||||
Sir Archibald's mother was Mabel, the beautiful daughter of Mahlon Sands, of New York, and through her he is connected by ties of kinsmanship with a number of New York families, including the Rutherfurds and the Vanderbilts. Sir Archibald will be known henceforth north of the Tweed as the Laird of Ulbster, and has now become chieftain of one of the branches of that great clan of Sinclair of which the seventeenth Earl of Caithness is the head. | ||||||
His grandfather, the late Sir John, was a very eccentric character. He rarely, if ever, dined at a restaurant in vogue, never used to go to a theater or to the opera or even to a music hall, rarely dined out, and was never seen at a ball or party. In spite of his great wealth, he had neither carriages, horse, nor automobiles; walked by preference, and when riding was imperative, made use of the democratic omnibus. | ||||||
He would live on herrings and hominy, cooked in his lodgings just off St. James street by himself over a spirit lamp, and then on the following day would fuss over the merits or demerits of the world-famed chef of the Travelers, the most exclusive club in London, of which this wonderful old laird, with his odd-looking wig and his beard, his erect and spare, tall figure, and his extraordinary flow of conversation was one of the oldest members. | ||||||
In spite of his numerous castles, country seats, and houses in England, Scotland, and on the Continent, he lived entirely, during the last 30 years of his life, in his lodgings off St. James street, the walls of which were hung with the not particularly attractive Sinclair tartan. Its hues, however, were more or less concealed by the most heterogeneous collection of pictures, some of them priceless gems, others the most worthless daubs. In one word, his rooms, like his castles and country seats, were filled with a mixture of art treasures and art rubbish. | ||||||
Sir John may be said to have commenced his public career rather early, since he was page of honor to Queen Adelaide in the reign of William IV, receiving, on his resignation of that post, at the age of 17, the customary commission in the Scots Guards. He married away back in the early fifties one of the beautiful Anglo-French Standishes of Duxbury Park, and this naturally brought him into close contact with the court of the Tuileries, and with the great world in Paris during the palmy days of the empire. | ||||||
Indeed, Sir John was at one time a familiar a figure in Paris as in London, and it is no exaggeration to assert that he met and was personally acquainted more or less intimately with nearly every notable personage of the Victorian era, from Nicholas I of Russia and the great Duke of Wellington to the present czar and Emperor William, and comprising Prince Bismarck, with whom he stayed at Friedrichsruhe: Count Cavour, Mazzini, Garibaldi, Empress Eugenie, both prior and subsequent to her marriage: Marshal Prim, Emperor Maximilian of Mexico, Thiers etc. | ||||||
His "Reminiscences" which he printed for private circulation, and of which he sent me a copy some years ago, contain many things that are trivial, almost to the point of childishness, and here and there something of real importance. But such as they are, they all help to increase the understanding of the personages with whom they deal. | ||||||
To record Sir John's eccentricities would fill a volume. Some years ago he endeavored to relieve the monotony of the poorhouses all over England and Scotland by presenting them with gramophones, the records consisting, however, not of popular tunes, but of speeches which he delivered and of recitations which he had given, either of his own works or of his favorite authors. | ||||||
Among the latter, first and foremost, was Byron, among the most extraordinary memorials that have ever been designed to perpetuate the name of this or any other bard is that which Sir John conceived and put into execution. Instead of taking the form of a statue, it assumed the altogether utilitarian shape of an office building, occupying the site of the old offices of the London comic weekly Punch, on the south side of Fleet street, near St. Bride's Church. | ||||||
Every stone of the hall pavement of this great office building, which will bring in a large income to his grandson and heir, the now baronet, young Sir Archibald, in the way of rental, is inscribed, "Byron, the Pilgrim of Eternity", and the dates of his birth and death. Each tile is adorned with the words "Crede Byron", while on every block of marble lining the walls are verses from his poems, particularly stanzas from "Childe Harold" and "Don Juan". | ||||||
And as if Byron's verses were not sufficient, other inscriptions on the walls record the opinions expressed concerning him by such men as Schiller, Goethe, Victor Hugo, Lamartine, Tennyson, Chateaubriand, Sir Walter Scott and Matthew Arnold. Yet another inscription on the wall states that the British Museum library catalogue devotes 28 pages to Byron and only 10 to Tennyson. On still another, Sir John Sinclair records the fact that one edition for the blind has been published of Byron's works, and none of Tennyson's. Over the entrance is a beautiful medallion portrait of Byron in white marble, with Shelley's splendid epitaph, "The Pilgrim of Eternity", and I need scarcely say that the office building bears the name of Byron House. | ||||||
One would be apt to imagine that the overwhelming quantity of Byronic quotations, adorning as they do every vacant place, every stone and tile, and all the walls, floors and ceilings, would be apt to get on the nerves of the occupants. But apparently this is not the case. The building is full of tenants. | ||||||
Sir George Reresby Sitwell, 4th baronet | ||||||
The following is extracted from The Emperor of the United States of America and Other Magnificent British Eccentrics by Catherine Caufield (Routledge & Kegan Paul, London 1981) | ||||||
Although Sir George Sitwell lived in the 19th and 20th centuries, his heart and mind were in the fourteenth. He was lord of the manor of Eckington in Derbyshire for eighty-one years, a position that suited him to perfection, or would have if the world hadn't changed so much in the last 500 years. A sign in his house ran: 'I must ask anyone entering the house never to contradict me in any way, as it interferes with the functioning of the gastric juices and prevents my sleeping at night. | ||||||
His interests, though obscure, were wide-ranging. Seven sitting-rooms at Renishaw Hall were co-opted to serve as his studies. All were littered with books and notes, each subject filed in its own specially constructed box. Some of the more intriguing titles for possible future monographs were: | ||||||
The Black Death at Rotherham | ||||||
The Use of the Bed | ||||||
Osbert's Debts | ||||||
Acorns as an Article of Medieval Diet | ||||||
Sachie's Mistakes | ||||||
Pig Keeping in the Thirteenth Century | ||||||
The History of the Fork | ||||||
Domestic Manners in Sheffield in the Year 1250 | ||||||
My Advice on Poetry | ||||||
Lepers' Squints [my personal favourite] | ||||||
Wool-Gathering in Medieval Times and Since | ||||||
The Errors of Modern Parents | ||||||
The Eckington Dump | ||||||
The Origin of the Word Gentleman | ||||||
The History of the Cold | ||||||
My Inventions | ||||||
Any article on the last subject would have to include the Sitwell Egg. With a yolk of smoked meat, a white of compressed rice and a shell of synthetic lime, this was intended to be a convenient and nourishing meal for travellers. Sir George decided to put the marketing of his egg into the experienced hands of Mr Gordon Selfridge, founder of the famous Oxford Street shop. Wearing a silk hat and frock coat, he appeared in Selfridge's office one morning without an appointment, and announced, 'I'm Sir George Sitwell and I've brought my egg with me.' He told no one what Selfridge said, but soon after this encounter the egg project was quietly shelved. There were other inventions, however, including a musical toothbrush that played 'Annie Laurie' and a small revolver for killing wasps. | ||||||
Sir George's strength of personality was matched by that of his three talented children, or nearly so, for although they all managed successful careers of their own in the end, his disapproval of virtually everything they did was a major factor in their development. When Osbert announced that he was thinking of writing a novel, he was told, 'Oh I shouldn't do that if I were you! My cousin, Stephen Arthington, had a friend who utterly ruined his health writing a novel!' Of Edith's literary aspirations, his comment was: 'Edith made a great mistake by not going in for lawn tennis.' He was also an enthusiastic advocate of gymnastics: 'Nothing a young man likes so much as a girl who's good at the parallel bars.' This is at least as useful a piece of advice as another of his favourite maxims: 'Nothing makes a man so popular as singing after dinner.' Sitwell's attitude towards his children is summarised in his comment to Osbert: 'It is dangerous for you to lose touch with me for a single day. You never know when you may need the benefit of my experience and advice.' | ||||||
Losing touch for as many days as possible became a major preoccupation for Osbert and Sacheverell who invented a mythical yacht, the Rover, and had headed notepaper printed on which they wrote to their father regretting that as the itinerary was as yet unsettled they could not give him an address where they might be contacted. All this time they were in London or Italy, but in spite of Sir George's not infrequent excursions to both places, they were in little danger of being discovered since he rarely recognised his children outside the home. | ||||||
Of course the temptation, one might almost say the need, to tease such a father was great. Sir George was particularly vulnerable with regard to modern developments, say since 1650. He knew nothing of modern slang. Shocked by the bad behaviour of an acquaintance who offered him a piece of jewellery and failed to deliver it, Sir George complained to Osbert about modern manners. 'Such a pity to promise people things and then forget about them. It is most inconsiderate - really inexcusable.' The cause of this lament was the parting remark: 'I'll give you a ring, Sir George, on Thursday.' | ||||||
At one period Osbert used the word 'blotto' frequently and deliberately until his father finally rose to the bait and asked what it meant. He seemed interested to learn that it was slang for very tired. Shortly afterwards he took the opportunity of demonstrating how au fait he was with modern ways by suggesting to two guests that they should take a rest after lunch as they both seemed quite blotto. The children once got him to book a month's holiday at a lunatic asylum by representing it as a charming retreat, affectionately nicknamed 'the bin' by a core of loyal residents would could hardly bear to tear themselves away. | ||||||
Sir George's ignorance of, or refusal to acknowledge, the facts of modern life was extraordinary. He proposed, in the 1930s, an artist's ball, to which he suggested inviting Degas, Renoir, Rodin and Sergeant. [Degas had died in 1917, Renoir in 1919, Rodin in 1917 and Sargent, whom I presume is meant by 'Sergeant', in 1925.] For a while farming was his passion and he gave his long-suffering agent many valuable hints on how it was done in the fourteenth century. During this time he tried to pay, whenever possible, in kind: offering pigs and potatoes to Eton for Sacheverell's school fees. Osbert managed to get his allowance paid in currency, but his father arrived at the proper amount by studying the allowance granted the eldest son of the Lord of the Eckington Manor at the time of the Black Death. Lady Ida, Sir George's wife, got involved with an unscrupulous money-lender and, when her husband refused on principle to bail her out, became the centre of a painful and notorious lawsuit. This dreadful experience confirmed Sir George in his misanthropic views - as he said to Osbert, 'such a mistake to have friends' - and drove him even further into the life of a recluse. | ||||||
Sir George was acutely conscious of his many acts of generosity. What some misguided people saw as meddling, was, he knew only too well, self-sacrifice: the dedication of his time and thought to advance the good of others. This could be wearying and occasionally he gave vent to an exhausted plea for understanding. To a Salvation Army lass soliciting funds for Self-Denial Week, he sighed, 'For some people, self-denial week is every week.' | ||||||
He gave Osbert the benefit of his experience when in 1914 he wrote from Scarborough to his son, who was then an officer in the trenches: 'though you will not, of course, have to encounter anywhere abroad the same weight of gunfire that your mother and I had to face here, yet my experience may be useful to you. Directly you hear the first shell, retire, as I did, to the Undercroft, and remain there quietly until all firing had ceased. Even then a bombardment … is a strain upon the nervous system - but the best remedy for that, as always, is to keep warm and have plenty of plain, nourishing food at frequent but regular intervals. And, of course, plenty of rest, I find a nap in the afternoon most helpful … and I advise you to try it whenever possible.' | ||||||
Among his characteristic acts were banning electricity from Renishaw during his lifetime; limiting guests to two candles apiece; and insisting that the family drink cold boiled water rather than wine during travels in Italy. | ||||||
On his journeys alone through Italy Sir George stayed at very primitive inns, quite often sharing a dormitory with eight or ten other men in what was little more than a doss house. But he had with him his valet, Henry Moat, known as 'the Great Man', whose responsibility it was to rig the mosquito net each night and lay out the formal evening dress in which Sir George insisted on appearing for dinner at these tumbledown inns. The mosquito net was basic equipment - at home and abroad - for someone with Sir George's dread of disease and germs. He travelled with an extensive supply of medicines, all mislabelled to discourage - or at least to punish - anybody wanting to sample. His inflatable air cushion, another ever-present companion, was doughnut-shaped so that Sir George could slip it over his arm when not in using it. | ||||||
Decorating his two houses, Renishaw in Derbyshire and Montegufoni in Italy, and redesigning their gardens were Sir George's greatest pleasures. He spent enormous sums of money and a great deal of his own and other people's time on an endless succession of alterations and improvements. As Henry Moat said, 'He never entered any place, but he commencing pulling down and building up.' | ||||||
Sir George thought nothing of lowering lawns by several feet, making hills, relocating vast trees, creating or draining lakes. He had schemes for constructing or importing fountains, aqueducts, cascades, and statues of all descriptions. Four thousand men were set to work on an artificial lake at Renishaw. A plan was mooted to stencil Chinese blue-willow patterns on his white cows, but the cows' objections put an end to the project. Wooden survey towers loomed out of the lake to provide a vantage point for plotting further changes to the landscape. Nothing was ever completed, but that didn't prevent new projects being planned. And each new scheme struck terror into someone's heart; visiting his son Sacheverell's home in Weston in Northamptonshire in 1924, Sir George casually remarked as he looked out across the grounds. 'I don't propose to do much here; just a sheet of water and a line of statues. | ||||||
********************** | ||||||
Sir George's wife, Lady Ida, was the daughter of the 1st Earl of Londesborough. She had little, if any, notion of the value of money and didn't have the first idea of any matter connected with business. This led to appear in court on several occasions over money matters, as referred to above. She appeared in court in January 1899, October 1913 and November 1914, each appearance being related to her financial affairs. The most serious case was, however, in March 1915, when she was convicted on charges of conspiracy to cheat and defraud and sentenced to three months' imprisonment. | ||||||
The Slade baronetcy case of 1867 | ||||||
Like so many nineteenth century claims to titles, this case revolved around the legality of an earlier marriage ceremony, and the consequent legitimacy of the children born of that marriage. In 1867, General Marcus Slade challenged the legality of his brother's marriage, and claimed that the baronetcy and estates were rightfully his, rather than his nephew's. The following summary of the case appeared in the Newcastle Courant on 17 May 1867:- | ||||||
Celebrated as are the superior law courts for cases of romantic interest, it is seldom that a trial occurs involving more remarkable incidents than are to be found in that which has just been brought to a termination in the Court of Exchequer. It is called the Slade baronetcy case, by which the disposal of considerable estates in Somersetshire is challenged, the legitimacy of a family which has unquestionably been brought up on the estates, on the supposition of the right of inheritance, is impugned, and the question of the validity of the marriage of her who has passed for many years, and still passes, under the name of Lady Slade, is raised. | ||||||
To trace the affair from its source, we must begin with the entail of the estates in 1832 by General Sir John Slade. To him succeeded, in turn, his sons Henry and Charles, but they both died without issue, and the estates then devolved upon the third son, Frederick, so well known in legal circles under the name Sir Frederick William Slade. It appears that Sir Frederick, then Mr. Slade, probably without any expectation of succeeding to the family inheritance, whilst travelling on the continent about forty years since made the acquaintance of a Miss Mostyn, who lived with her mother. She was of good family, accomplished, and beautiful, apparently wealthy, and in social position by no means inferior to her admirer. From the evidence it would seem that Miss Mostyn's appearance had created quite a furore in Northern Italy, and Italians [who] are still living who can speak with fervour of her beauty in 1825. This is not the only romantic recollection attached to the lady's life, but it may be passed over for the present. About 1833 she was married to Mr. Slade in England. This is beyond all question, though it is affirmed that the marriage was not made public till 1848, when her husband succeeded to the baronetcy and estates in Somersetshire. [This is certainly not correct - he did not succeed to the title until 1859.] Since that period, however, Sir Frederick and Lady Slade lived in the enjoyment of social rank and distinction, their children were called by the family name, and no cloud - at least no cloud apparent to the public - obscured their happiness till the death of Sir Frederick in 1863. | ||||||
Then a singular difficulty arose, which has yet to be solved by the judges of the Exchequer Court. They have heard the evidence, and it is for them to decide what is legal or otherwise. In the meanwhile, the history may be given without prejudicing what is to follow. Miss Mostyn's beauty, while some gentlemen, who cannot be called chickens, still remember, did not alone move the impressionable Italians. One Baron Von Korber, a lieutenant in the Austrian service, was struck by it. He sought her hand, and won it. This was in 1825. But there was a difficulty in the way. The baron was a Protestant, the lady belonged to the Roman Catholic Church. Now the lovers were in Lombardy, where, as elsewhere, mixed marriages were forbidden except by express permission of the Pope, and it is certain that in this case the permission of the Pope was not obtained. Von Korber applied to the priest of the parish in Milan in which Miss Mostyn resided, but he declined to tie the conjugal knot. He knew the law, and he obeyed it. But his refusal, it seems, daunted neither Von Korber nor Miss Mostyn, for they, or he, at least, applied to a military chaplain of superior rank, and the thing was done. | ||||||
But the marriage was a most unhappy one. In six months the young couple separated never to meet again. A divorce a mensa et thoro [i.e. "from table and bed" - it refers to a type of divorce in which a couple is legally separated, but the marriage is still considered to be valid. The legitimacy of any children in the marriage remains intact, but the partners may not re-marry. This type of divorce allows partners to live apart without fear of being taken to court for desertion] was granted to them, and Von Korber's conscience permitted him to accept an annuity from his divorced wife in lieu of her affection and household management. | ||||||
The question which the Court of Exchequer must decide is the legality or illegality of this marriage. It is apparent that there was an incompatibility of temper, but that is not the matter at issue, because it is not sufficient to establish the validity of the divorce or the invalidity of the marriage. Both sides agree that, according to the Austrian law, the only person competent to celebrate a marriage is the man who had the cure of souls over one of the bridal persons, and the military chaplain could have no ecclesiastical authority over Miss Mostyn. Had he any over Von Korber? On one side it is contended that he had none whatever. Von Korber was a Protestant, and the regimental chaplain, who belonged to another sect, could not have had any ecclesiastical authority over him. But then, it is said, a soldier in the Austrian service differs from a civilian in this respect. It is insisted that an Austrian soldier is under special legislation, which "cures" him spiritually whether he is willing or not, so that Von Korber in this sense was performing a strictly legal act when he, a Protestant soldier, went to a Roman Catholic priest to be married. | ||||||
The business of the Court of Exchequer is to clear up and decide these subtle points; but though the solution of them will decide this important case, something still remains to be told of the interesting history. The plaintiff [General Marcus Slade], who claims the estates and the baronetcy, is a younger [twin] brother of the late Sir Frederick. He is a general in the army, and he holds the position of Governor of Guernsey Castle. He declares that he challenged the marriage of his brother as illegal as soon as he heard of it in 1848, and the correspondence is extant to prove his assertion. In 1860, his nephew, the eldest son of Sir Frederick Slade, wrote to him on the subject, and the general in reply urged him to settle the case by law. He acknowledged him as the son of his brother, but not as his legitimate son, for Von Korber did not die till 1854, and then he added that, whatever the legal decision might be, his nephew might reckon upon him as a friend at all times. His letter was frank and manly in tone, nor was that of his nephew at all deficient in these qualities. For the estates, he said, he did not care, but for his legitimacy he did, and if his uncle would help him to procure a legal decision, he would have the case cleared up as soon as possible. | ||||||
In this painful romance there is, therefore, no family bitterness or animosity. It is one of the curiosities of the law of entail, one of the pleasures the landed gentry indulge in by the rule of primogeniture. It is absurd to suppose that Sir Frederick and Lady Slade did not believe they were married in 1833. It is contrary to evidence to imagine that they did not bring up their family since 1848 according to the rules of legitimacy prevailing in their circle, and yet, though Sir Frederick Slade could, and no doubt did, dispose of his personalty by will, he must leave to a law court to resolve whether those nearest to him in blood and love could succeed to the property he enjoyed in his lifetime, or whether it must go to others over whom he had no legal control or direction. | ||||||
When the Court of Exchequer gave its judgment in June 1867, the four judges were locked at 2-all. The Chief Baron, Sir Fitzroy Kelly, and one of the other three Puisne Barons, Sir Samuel Martin found in favour of Sir Alfred Slade. The remaining two Barons, Sir George Bramwell (later Baron Bramwell) and Sir Gillery Pigott, found in favour of General Slade. In the event of a split decision, it was the custom at that time for the junior Baron (in this case, Sir Gillery Pigott) to withdraw his opinion, and the case to be then transferred to the House of Lords for judgment. Before this could occur, however, the case was settled out of court, as reported in the Aberdeen Journal of 31 July 1867:- | ||||||
The Slade baronetcy case has been compromised. General Slade, according to the terms of rrangement brought about by the action of mutual friends, abandons all claim to the title and the estates, receiving from his nephew, the present inheritor, £28,000, and the amount of costs for which he had become liable in connection with the recent litigation. | ||||||
Sir Benjamin Julian Alfred Slade, 7th baronet | ||||||
Sir Benjamin is a magnificent eccentric whose exploits have appeared in the newspapers in recent years. His major goal in life appears to be the discovery of a male heir to inherit his 13th century estate, variously valued at between £7 million to £20 million. | ||||||
In February 2007, it was reported that Sir Benjamin "is a firm believer in his aristocratic bloodline, claiming that he can trace his ancestry back to Alfred the Great. For this reason, he hopes to use DNA testing to find his closest genetic relative in the U.S. 'I'm hoping it won't be some cowpoke or someone who lives on a trailer park surrounded by rattlesnakes. I would have a screaming fit if I found out it was some chap like that. I want someone with a bit of money and a couple of yachts.'" | ||||||
Sir Benjamin later changed tack and began seeking a woman to give him an heir. "I need a male heir. I'm the last of the line. Father would be appalled. It's a terrible disgrace. When you die without an heir they cut your crest in half on your coffin with a sword and some other lot go and grab it. Awful. It's like losing your rugger colours." | ||||||
When describing the ideal woman, Sir Benjamin said, "They wouldn't want to be gypsies. They wouldn't want to be Guardian readers either. Africa's out. So is anywhere that's got green in its flag, begins with an 'I' or where they don’t wear overcoats in the winter. Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Iraq, Iran - all out. I won't go to holidays in these places. I don't want anything to do with them. Oh, and the breeders couldn't be too eccentric because I'm eccentric, so you'd get someone coming out who's utterly raving." | ||||||
Sir Benjamin said he has nine months supply of "little wrigglers" frozen and ready for the right woman to carry his child. The French, drug users, communists, and homosexuals have also been ruled out. | ||||||
In keeping with Sir Benjamin's sense of civic duty, he offered the services of his dog as a best man for gay weddings at his country seat. According to his master, the dog, a labrador-Doberman cross named Jasper, is ideally suited for this task. "Jasper is absolutely perfect for the role. For one thing, he is gay himself. He may also appeal to the more cosmopolitan among potential same-sex suitors as he is anti-hunting, a pacifist and probably supports New Labour." | ||||||
In October 2007, Sir Benjamin made a claim on his insurers for £4,000 after he alleged that a randy peacock had 'sexually attacked' one of his employee's cars. He subsequently banned peacock blue Lexus cars from the estate's car park. According to Sir Benjamin, the incident proved that the peacock was gay, since peahens are brown and only males are blue. He said that the peacock had damaged the car because it looked like "another peacock boy. He attacked the panels so hard that the car needs a total respray. The insurers are not very happy about it. They've had claims for all sorts of things like lions biting people, but never have they heard of a peacock sexually attacking a car." | ||||||
For an hilarious interview with Sir Benjamin, cut and paste the following link into your browser:- | ||||||
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/profiles/sir-benjamin-slade-i-am-going-to-be-a-mega-megastar-815130.html | ||||||
A more recent article on Sir Benjamin's efforts appeared in the "Daily Mail on 21 April 2017, written by Jane Fryer:- | ||||||
Sir Benjamin Julian Alfred Slade is a rheumy-eyed Casanova who has a most disconcerting habit of pointing his crotch and talking about 'business down there'. | ||||||
He describes his ideal woman as 'a big strong healthy warrior, the bigger the better - if I see a tall woman coming into a room, I just fall over backwards. My tongue hangs out. It gets exciting." | ||||||
Last week he caused a furore when he denounced one of his recent (extremely attractive) companions, Bridget Convet, 50, as 'too old to have children' and reminded all young, fertile ladies that he is once again 'interviewing hard' for the position of Lady Slade. | ||||||
"I have had a few proposals, " he said. "But sometimes the women are past their sell-by date and have been over the guns a few times." | ||||||
Sir Ben, as he likes to be addressed, is 70 years old himself. | ||||||
Subsequently he announced that he wanted to 'road-test' young women, adding: "It would be nice if they were a breeder, of an age where they can have a couple of sons." | ||||||
On paper - away from the leery, pink-cheeked flesh - Sir Ben's pedigree is impeccable. His ancestors fought in the Crimean War; he had links to Horatio Nelson; General Sir John Slade, who bought the family seat, Maunsel House, in 1772, danced with Marie Antoinette; and his aunt Madeleine Slade, as he indelicately puts it, "s*****d [Mahatma] Gandhi." | ||||||
He is worth about £20 million and owns two Somerset stately homes, 13th-century Maunsel House and 19th-century Woodlands Castle, from which he runs a thriving wedding business. He also has thousands of acres, a handful of farms, a grouse shoot in Scotland, a collection of moth-eaten stuffed animal heads, hundreds of guns and wardrobes of red trousers. | ||||||
Which presumably is why he is so desperate for an heir (plus a spare) to inherit it all when he dies. "Daughters don't count," he says. "Wonderful things to have around, of course, but they don't count." | ||||||
Over the years he has been relentless in his quest, rattling through a wife, Pauline Myburgh; several long-term lovers including Fiona Aitken, now wife of the Earl of Carnarvon and chatelaine of Highclere Castle, where Downton [Abbey] was filmed. ("absolutely impossible woman; social astronaut, drove me mad!"); actress Kirsten Hughes and, by his own account, more members of European 'jet-trash' society than most gentry have had roast grouse dinners. | ||||||
But he can't seem to get it right. "I'm the worst judge of women in England. I've had five mad women on the trot; it's been very difficult." | ||||||
In 2007 he made a public appeal for an heir of sorts, offering his entire estate to whichever stranger most closely matched his DNA, so long as they weren't Guardian readers, drug-users or communists. That didn't work because the winner, Isaac Slade, who fronts U.S. rock group The Fray, was too busy with his band to deal with sweeping driveways and the worry of dry rot. | ||||||
Then in 2012, after Kirsten, then 49, had, according to him, "run off with the handyman," Sir Ben wasted no time in advertising to replace not only the handyman but Kirsten, too, offering a £50,000 salary plus car, house, food and holidays. | ||||||
Crucially, the successful candidate would have a shotgun certificate, be able to run two castles and must be able to breed two sons (it didn't matter if she had bred before). And when that didn't bear fruit, he had his sperm frozen ("it's very good stuff") and carried on chatting up 'any bit of crumpet that moves' - so long as she didn't come from a country with green in its flag, beginning with an "I", or anywhere they don't wear overcoats in the winter. | ||||||
But still there was no heir apparent riding a trike through the great hall. | ||||||
So is he really an appalling man, playing for laughs or publicity, or has desperation made him so ungallant? | ||||||
Whatever the truth, his recent comments have not gone down well. Bridget, unsurprisingly, was hopping mad, not least because they haven't been an item since 2014 and she is actually happily engaged to a chap called Alister. Online, thousands have denounced Sir Ben as a sexist dinosaur. | ||||||
"I'm not sexist, " he says. "Men want to carve a joint and pour the drinks, women want to make sure the table looks nice. It's a partnership!" | ||||||
But a fair few, perhaps tempted by his surprisingly good skin as much as his fortune, got in touch this week. "I've been inundated with offers!" he chirps happily, oblivious to the feminist blood boiling around him. "I'm going to have a party and get them all down. The more the merrier!" | ||||||
Hugely encouraged, he has even added new criteria to his list of required attributes. Driving and shooting licences are now non-negotiable. The former is to drive him to long boozy lunches, while the latter is more pressing since police found an unlicensed shotgun in his bedroom - he liked to shoot foxes in his pyjamas - and he nearly landed in prison. Scorpios are also a no-no. And now he is slowing down a bit, so is anyone much under 30 or over 40. | ||||||
A 'terribly exotic Spanish creature' he dated 18 months ago was duly informed of this necessity. She said: "Darling, you're too old for me." And I said:"No darling, you'll be 40 next year - you're too old for me!" | ||||||
Sir Ben, who made his fortune in shipping but then put most of his money into his estate, is now asset-rich but cash-poor, so life with him will not be all butlers, polished silverware and devilled kidneys. He re-uses teabags and lives on vegetable juice, Ryvita, watery porridge and the occasional gull's egg as a treat. | ||||||
To save £15,000 tax a year, he has moved out of Maunsel House into a half-built farmhouse where he scrimps on the heating, shares a bedroom with his Jack Russell, Bully, and labrador, Gerald, named after the late Duke of Westminster, and has an inspirational message from Donald Trump by his bed (he and Trump's first wife, Ivana, were good pals). | ||||||
He rises at six, works all hours on his wedding business and wears holey jumpers. "Most women don't understand," he says. "It's a nightmare running this place. The heating bill's £50,000 a year. They don't tend to stay." | ||||||
He is also constantly tired thanks to a sleep disorder, and has suffered a brief problem with his prostate - or 'bicycle pump' as he calls it - which he keeps 'fired up' with oysters. Other than that he claims to be in excellent health and even hangs upside down in a harness every morning to reduce stress. "Stress is not good - and it's not good for down there, either," he says, stabbing at his crotch yet again. "That's why I need a good woman to help with it all. A good woman could be worth £100k to me, minimum, and she could pop out some heirs while she's at it." | ||||||
But, given his health problem, is he up to the job? "Mao Tse Tung was bonking away when he was 80! So was Moses. I'm slowing down a bit - I just don't get enough practice in," he says sadly. Then he tells me he isn't a fan of Viagra, preferring a similar drug called Cialis: "It's really good - lasts all weekend." There is also a concoction that his French nephew obtains from the Far East, which he puts in his tea and which makes him go 'like greased lightning.' | ||||||
I wonder if all this is bluster and fantasy. So we move back to his childhood, which went from happy to unutterably miserable when he was ten and his elder brother died (in a car crash), followed by his mother the next year, then his uncle, then his father the year after that. Young Ben was shipped off to a distant relative for his troubled teens, then packed off to Australia on a one-way ticket, where he worked in the mines and on sheep stations and slept rough. Despite having to overcome the odds, his grief and terrible dyslexia he pulled through, made a fortune in shipping and bought back the family seat from his aunt. | ||||||
Given the parallels, I ask about Prince Harry's mental health charity. But he just harrumphs. "They're all nuts, really. And his mother was totally screwed up. Everyone knows there are three families you should never marry into and the Spencers is one!" | ||||||
It is easy to see why he wants children - "if I drop dead today, this place will be on the market in a month" - and he is convinced he'd make a good father. "People tell me 'you're too old. You'll die.' So what? I was bloody orphaned. Anyway, a nice young attractive widow with two castles and a title is going to get snapped up pretty quickly." | ||||||
What is surprising is that he never did manage to father a child, despite all that frantic rutting. He blames what he calls "Fallopian complications" and claims "too many cats" were responsible for his marriage failure. But what about adoption? He looks horrified. "People don't give anything away that's any good, do they?" And a baby from overseas, he says, was completely out of the question. "If you're living in the countryside and into hunting and shooting, an Aboriginal or an African probably wouldn't go down too well round here. They might not let someone like me adopt anyway." This is probably the wisest thing he has said so far. | ||||||
On the flip side, though, having Sir Ben as your dad might be a relentlessly politically incorrect experience and you'd never dare bring anyone home for tea, but it would never be dull. He is the sort of man who throws wild parties, has 5,000 people in his address book and is someone to whom mad things inevitably happen. | ||||||
Who else would have a peacock called Ron Davies (after the Labour MP whose career was destroyed by a 'moment of madness' involving a homosexual encounter on Clapham Common) which caused £4,000 damage to a peacock-blue car in a bout of misplaced ardour? Sir Ben also cited a tomcat as co-respondent in his divorce. Then there was the time he went to court to fight for custody of a rescue dog called Jasper that had been rehomed to a brewery heiress. He was bequeathed to Slade, along with a trust fund that rose in value to £100,000 when his owner died. | ||||||
Extraordinarily, Sir Ben's exes seem genuinely fond of him. "For some reason they all want to come back - even Kirsten, who behaved disgracefully. Because I might not be the best looker but there's always something happening and I make them laugh." And then, just as he is finally starting to sound more like a naughty uncle than a sexist oaf, he blows it by describing the shape of his favourite breasts. "I do like them pointing upwards. I once had an American girlfriend who had them pointing upwards. Just wonderful. And big, ideally, but I certainly don't want some tired old flap they can throw over the shoulder!" | ||||||
Oh stop it, Sir Ben! You are clearly far brighter that you let on and work like a Trojan, but it's as if you have a constant need to offend - especially when, against all odds, someone might actually be warming to you. | ||||||
Sir Andrew Slanning, 2nd and last baronet | ||||||
Sir Andrew was murdered in November 1700. The following account of his murder is taken from Celebrated Trials and Remarkable Cases of Criminal Jurisprudence from the earliest records to the year 1825 by George Borrow [1803‑1881] (6 vols, Knight and Lacey, London, 1825). | ||||||
One evening John Cowland, with some other bon vivants, followed Sir Andrew Slanning, bart. who had made a temporary acquaintance with an orange-woman while in the pit at the Drury Lane play-house, and retired with her as soon as the play was ended. They had gone but a few yards before Mr. Cowland put his arm round the woman's neck; on which Sir Andrew desired he would desist, as she was his wife. | ||||||
Cowland, knowing Sir Andrew was married to a woman of honour, gave him the lie, and swords were drawn on both sides; but some gentlemen coming up at this juncture, no immediate ill consequence happened. They all now agreed to adjourn to the Rose tavern; and Capt. Wagget having there used his utmost endeavours to reconcile the offended parties, it appeared that his mediation was attended with success; but, as they were going upstairs to drink a glass of wine, Mr. Cowland drew his sword, and stabbed Sir Andrew in the belly, who finding himself wounded, cried out "murder". One of Lord Warwick's servants, and two other persons who were within the house, ran up immediately, and disarmed Cowland of his sword, which was bloody to the depth of five inches, and took him into custody. Cowland was instantly conducted before a justice of the peace, who committed him; and on Dec. the 5th, 1700, he was tried at the Old Bailey on three indictments - the first at the common law, the second on the statute of stabbing, and the third on the coroner's inquest for the murder. Every fact was fully proved on the trial; and among other things, it was deposed, that the deceased possessed an estate of £20,000 a year, and that his family became extinct by his death; and that he had been a gentleman of great good-nature, and by no means disposed to animosity. On Cowland's being found guilty, sentence of death was passed on him; and though great interest was made to obtain a pardon, he was executed at Tyburn the 20th Dec. 1700. | ||||||
Sir Henry Slingsby, 1st baronet | ||||||
Sir Henry was executed in June 1658 due to his loyalty to the Royalist cause during the English Civil War. Following a planned Royalist insurrection in 1655, Slingsby was arrested and imprisoned at Hull, and later at York, where he remained until 1658, but following a further royal plot against the Commonwealth in that year, he was brought before the High Court and charged with treason. He was initially sentenced to be hanged, drawn and quartered, but the sentence was later commuted to beheading, the sentence being carried out on Tower Hill on 8 June 1658. The following account of his execution is taken from The characters of the several noblemen and gentlemen that have died in the defence of their respective princes … by Thomas Salmon [London 1724]:- | ||||||
About Eleven of the Clock, Sir Henry Slingsby was brought from the Tower to the Scaffold on Tower-Hill; whither being come, he fell upon his Knees, and for a short Space pray'd privately. Then standing up, he did in a short Speech, and with a very low Voice, address himself to Mr. Sheriff Robinson, telling him, that what he had to say he would speak to him; which was to this purpose: | ||||||
That he had receiv'd a Sentence to die, upon account of his endeavouring to betray the Garrison of Hull: But said, All that he did in that Business he was drawn into by others. | ||||||
That the Officers of that Garrison did believe he had some greater Design in hand, and therefore they would needs pump him to the bottom: But what he spoke to them in private was brought into Evidence against him. He likewise said, That he did no more than any Person would have done that was so brought on. | ||||||
That he had made many Applications (by his Friends) for a Reprieve, but found his Highness was inexorable. | ||||||
He did confess, that he did deliver a Commission (as it was charged against him:) But said, that it was an old Commission, and what he meant was well known to himself; but what Constructions others had made of it might appear by his present Condition. | ||||||
He discover'd little Sense of Sorrow, or Fear of Death; but said, He was ready to submit, or Words to like purpose. | ||||||
Then he addressed himself to private Prayer again; and kneeling down to the Block, he pray'd privately for a short space: Then he laid his Head upon the Block, and at the Sign given, the Executioner sever'd his Head from his Body at one Blow: And his Friends put his Body into a Coffin, and remov'd it into a close Coach prepared near the Place. | ||||||
Sir Charles Slingsby, 10th baronet | ||||||
Sir Charles, along with five others, was drowned in 1869 when the boat upon which he was crossing a river capsized. The following edited account of the accident appeared in the Dublin Freeman's Journal on 8 February 1869:- | ||||||
[After describing at length the names of the persons who had met for a fox-hunt] … no fox was found until the hounds reached Monckton Whin; but a good run of about an hour's duration was had towards Copgrove and Newby Hall, and near the latter the fox and the pack crossed the river Ure. Several of the gentlemen who were in pursuit attempted to cross the river at a ford some distance up the stream, but Sir Charles Slingsby and a majority of those who were close up made for the ferry, which is almost directly opposite Newby-hall, and signalled for the boat to be sent across. Swollen by the late rains, and to a great extent diverted from its natural channel, the river, at this point some fifty or sixty yards broad, swept along with a strong deep current. | ||||||
With little or no hesitation the master of the hounds [Sir Charles] sprang into the boat, to be piloted across by the Newby-hall gardener and his son, and this example was so largely followed that in a very short time some twelve or fourteen gentlemen with their horses, crowded into a vessel intended to accommodate only half that number … [a number of others] who were either unable to find room in the boat or had their doubts as to its safety, remained on the banks awaiting its return. No warning voice cautioned them when they started on what proved to some of them a fatal journey; indeed, their apparent luck in having gained the start of the others was looked on many envious eyes. Any such feeling was, however, of short duration. | ||||||
Seizing the chain by which the flat-bottomed boat is propelled, Captain Vyner and his brother pushed it off from the river side, and sent the vessel right into the stream. Before one-third of the distance had been traversed, Sir Charles Slingsby's horse became restive, and kicked the animal belonging to Sir George Wombwell. The latter - a high-mettled chestnut - returned the kick, and something very like a panic arose among the horses. The boat was swayed first to one side and then to the other, and finally it was fairly turned bottom upwards. | ||||||
The scene which then ensued was of a very painful character. For a moment the slimy bottom of the boat, rocked to and fro by the struggling of the men and horses, was all that could be seen by the spectators on the bank; then here and there in different parts of the stream heads began to appear only to sink again amid agonised cries, and hands and arms were flung up in despair. Horses were seen to battle with the current, striking out regardless of the injuries they inflicted on their masters, who were also swept by the current out of the reach of those anxious to afford relief. In some cases, however, the prompt measures taken by the spectators were effectual. Those who could swim cast off their coats and plunged to save their friends, while others, not so happily gifted, took less vigorous, though not less useful, steps. Lines formed of whips tied together, and thrown within reach of the drowning men, and several beams of wood which fortunately lay scattered about, were quickly launched on the stream. | ||||||
Captain Vyner was one of the first to get his head out of water, and to save himself from the current by clinging to the upturned vessel. After a vigorous struggle he reached the top of the boat and was able to assist first Sir George Wombwell and afterwards one of the York officers to the same position. Mr. White got on shore by means of the chain stretched across the ferry, while others were rescued by means adopted for their safety from the banks. In a very few minutes, however, it was found that six men and 11 horses had been drowned. Two horses were rescued. | ||||||
Sir Charles Slingsby was seen by the spectators on the bank to strike out for the opposite shore, but when nearing it he threw up his hands, and the last seen of him was his body floating down the river with his head and legs under water … The body of Sir Charles Slingsby was discovered 300 yards below the scene of the accident. | ||||||
Copyright © 2003-2018 Leigh Rayment | ||
Copyright © 2020-2025 Helen Belcher OBE | ||